Is quality assurance compatible with technological innovation? Case studies of massive open online courses (MOOCs) in United Kingdom higher education

Ahmed A. Al-Imarah, Robin Shields, Richard Kamm

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

Both innovation and quality assurance are prominent concerns in higher education institutions but research is ambiguous with respect to the relationship between quality assurance and innovation. Specifically, it is unclear whether quality assurance supports innovation or, conversely, acts as a hindrance. As a relatively new innovation, massive open online courses (MOOCs) yield insights into the relationship between quality assurance and innovation in higher education institutions. This article explores how quality assurance is adapted to accommodate MOOCs based on case studies in five universities in the United Kingdom. Our findings suggest that quality assurance does not support innovations such as MOOCs because most universities use a relatively superficial approach that focuses on technical requirements rather than academic quality. The study provides suitable empirical evidence to support a cogent argument that universities should evaluate MOOCs through quality assurance, both to identify strengths and to expose weaknesses that need to be developed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4-19
Number of pages16
JournalQuality in Higher Education
Volume27
Issue number1
Early online date23 Nov 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Nov 2020

Keywords

  • higher education
  • innovation
  • MOOCs
  • Quality assurance
  • universities

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is quality assurance compatible with technological innovation? Case studies of massive open online courses (MOOCs) in United Kingdom higher education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this