Is it the end for anonymity as we know it? A critical examination of the ethical principle of anonymity in the context of 21st century demands on the qualitative researcher

Liz Tilley, Kate Woodthorpe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)
65 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Told from the perspective of two UK-based early career researchers, this article is an examination of contemporary challenges posed when dealing with the ethical principle of anonymity in qualitative research, specifically at the point of dissemination. Drawing on their respective doctoral experience and literature exploring the difficulties that can arise from the application of anonymity with regard to historical and geographical contexts, the authors question the applicability of the principle of anonymity alongside pressures to disseminate widely. In so doing, the article considers anonymity in relation to the following: demonstrating value for money to funders; being accountable to stakeholders; involvement in knowledge transfer; and the demands of putting as much information ‘out there’ as possible, particularly on the internet. In light of these pressures, the article suggests that the standard of anonymity in the context of the 21st century academic world may need to be rethought.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)197-212
Number of pages16
JournalQualitative Research
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2011

Fingerprint

anonymity
examination
knowledge transfer
qualitative research
stakeholder
career
Ethical Principles
21st Century
Anonymity
Internet
experience

Keywords

  • knowledge transfer
  • ethics
  • dissemination
  • anonymity
  • accountability

Cite this

@article{823bba312078486a995978fb92c66ccc,
title = "Is it the end for anonymity as we know it? A critical examination of the ethical principle of anonymity in the context of 21st century demands on the qualitative researcher",
abstract = "Told from the perspective of two UK-based early career researchers, this article is an examination of contemporary challenges posed when dealing with the ethical principle of anonymity in qualitative research, specifically at the point of dissemination. Drawing on their respective doctoral experience and literature exploring the difficulties that can arise from the application of anonymity with regard to historical and geographical contexts, the authors question the applicability of the principle of anonymity alongside pressures to disseminate widely. In so doing, the article considers anonymity in relation to the following: demonstrating value for money to funders; being accountable to stakeholders; involvement in knowledge transfer; and the demands of putting as much information ‘out there’ as possible, particularly on the internet. In light of these pressures, the article suggests that the standard of anonymity in the context of the 21st century academic world may need to be rethought.",
keywords = "knowledge transfer, ethics, dissemination, anonymity, accountability",
author = "Liz Tilley and Kate Woodthorpe",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1177/1468794110394073",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "197--212",
journal = "Qualitative Research",
issn = "1468-7941",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is it the end for anonymity as we know it? A critical examination of the ethical principle of anonymity in the context of 21st century demands on the qualitative researcher

AU - Tilley, Liz

AU - Woodthorpe, Kate

PY - 2011/4

Y1 - 2011/4

N2 - Told from the perspective of two UK-based early career researchers, this article is an examination of contemporary challenges posed when dealing with the ethical principle of anonymity in qualitative research, specifically at the point of dissemination. Drawing on their respective doctoral experience and literature exploring the difficulties that can arise from the application of anonymity with regard to historical and geographical contexts, the authors question the applicability of the principle of anonymity alongside pressures to disseminate widely. In so doing, the article considers anonymity in relation to the following: demonstrating value for money to funders; being accountable to stakeholders; involvement in knowledge transfer; and the demands of putting as much information ‘out there’ as possible, particularly on the internet. In light of these pressures, the article suggests that the standard of anonymity in the context of the 21st century academic world may need to be rethought.

AB - Told from the perspective of two UK-based early career researchers, this article is an examination of contemporary challenges posed when dealing with the ethical principle of anonymity in qualitative research, specifically at the point of dissemination. Drawing on their respective doctoral experience and literature exploring the difficulties that can arise from the application of anonymity with regard to historical and geographical contexts, the authors question the applicability of the principle of anonymity alongside pressures to disseminate widely. In so doing, the article considers anonymity in relation to the following: demonstrating value for money to funders; being accountable to stakeholders; involvement in knowledge transfer; and the demands of putting as much information ‘out there’ as possible, particularly on the internet. In light of these pressures, the article suggests that the standard of anonymity in the context of the 21st century academic world may need to be rethought.

KW - knowledge transfer

KW - ethics

KW - dissemination

KW - anonymity

KW - accountability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79954521678&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1468794110394073

U2 - 10.1177/1468794110394073

DO - 10.1177/1468794110394073

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 197

EP - 212

JO - Qualitative Research

JF - Qualitative Research

SN - 1468-7941

IS - 2

ER -