Is 'better regulation' possible? Formal and substantive quality in the impact assessments in education and culture of the European Commission

Manuel Souto-Otero

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 11 Citations

Abstract

This article explores the initial results produced by the European Commission's 'better regulation agenda', which aims to stimulate productivity and employment, on the use of evidence and its potential to enhance democratic governance. The article finds that implausible rational models of policy making dictate the ways in which the Commission is expected to conceive its programmes, and these models are adopted to legitimise rather than inform decisions. This negatively affects the processes by which interventions are designed and their social credibility. These processes are illustrated through an analysis of EU regulatory impact assessments in lifelong learning, culture, youth and citizenship during 2002-07.
LanguageEnglish
Pages513-529
JournalEvidence and Policy
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
StatusPublished - 1 Nov 2013

Fingerprint

European Commission
regulation
learning culture
lifelong learning
credibility
education
citizenship
EU
productivity
governance
evidence

Cite this

Is 'better regulation' possible? Formal and substantive quality in the impact assessments in education and culture of the European Commission. / Souto-Otero, Manuel.

In: Evidence and Policy, Vol. 9, No. 4, 01.11.2013, p. 513-529.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{185dade8b9ad4467aea846644d55fc9b,
title = "Is 'better regulation' possible? Formal and substantive quality in the impact assessments in education and culture of the European Commission",
abstract = "This article explores the initial results produced by the European Commission's 'better regulation agenda', which aims to stimulate productivity and employment, on the use of evidence and its potential to enhance democratic governance. The article finds that implausible rational models of policy making dictate the ways in which the Commission is expected to conceive its programmes, and these models are adopted to legitimise rather than inform decisions. This negatively affects the processes by which interventions are designed and their social credibility. These processes are illustrated through an analysis of EU regulatory impact assessments in lifelong learning, culture, youth and citizenship during 2002-07.",
author = "Manuel Souto-Otero",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1332/174426413X662725",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "513--529",
journal = "Evidence and Policy",
issn = "1744-2648",
publisher = "Policy Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is 'better regulation' possible? Formal and substantive quality in the impact assessments in education and culture of the European Commission

AU - Souto-Otero,Manuel

PY - 2013/11/1

Y1 - 2013/11/1

N2 - This article explores the initial results produced by the European Commission's 'better regulation agenda', which aims to stimulate productivity and employment, on the use of evidence and its potential to enhance democratic governance. The article finds that implausible rational models of policy making dictate the ways in which the Commission is expected to conceive its programmes, and these models are adopted to legitimise rather than inform decisions. This negatively affects the processes by which interventions are designed and their social credibility. These processes are illustrated through an analysis of EU regulatory impact assessments in lifelong learning, culture, youth and citizenship during 2002-07.

AB - This article explores the initial results produced by the European Commission's 'better regulation agenda', which aims to stimulate productivity and employment, on the use of evidence and its potential to enhance democratic governance. The article finds that implausible rational models of policy making dictate the ways in which the Commission is expected to conceive its programmes, and these models are adopted to legitimise rather than inform decisions. This negatively affects the processes by which interventions are designed and their social credibility. These processes are illustrated through an analysis of EU regulatory impact assessments in lifelong learning, culture, youth and citizenship during 2002-07.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892586629&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/174426413X662725

U2 - 10.1332/174426413X662725

DO - 10.1332/174426413X662725

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 513

EP - 529

JO - Evidence and Policy

T2 - Evidence and Policy

JF - Evidence and Policy

SN - 1744-2648

IS - 4

ER -