TY - JOUR
T1 - Is a net life cycle balance for energy and materials achievable for a zero emission single-family building in Norway?
AU - Kristjansdottir, Torhildur Fjola
AU - Houlihan Wiberg, Aoife Anne Marie
AU - Andresen, Inger
AU - Georges, Laurent
AU - Heeren, Niko
AU - Good, Clara
AU - Brattebø, Helge
PY - 2018/3/1
Y1 - 2018/3/1
N2 - In this study, the objective is to redesign a previous concept for a single-family Zero greenhouse gas Emission Building (ZEB). The concept is redesigned based on comparing greenhouse gas (GHG) emission loads and compensation from different design solutions applied in Norwegian single-family ZEB pilot buildings and selected sensitivity studies. The objective is to see if a previously developed ZEB model (2011) can be redesigned to achieve a life cycle energy and material emission balance (ZEB-OM), which previously was not achieved. Five different design parameters are evaluated: area efficiency, embodied emissions in the envelope, insulation thickness, heating systems and different roof forms with respect to the photovoltaic area. Embodied emissions reductions were possible in the ground foundation, from around 1 kg CO2/m2 to 0.6 kg CO2/m2 per year. Both models are able to compensate for all operational emissions. The new model is in addition able to compensate for 60% of embodied emissions, whereas the previous model only could compensate for 5%. The new model does not reach the life cycle energy and material balance. The paper presents and discusses different approaches for achieving the ZEB-OM balance. Further concept model optimization is needed.
AB - In this study, the objective is to redesign a previous concept for a single-family Zero greenhouse gas Emission Building (ZEB). The concept is redesigned based on comparing greenhouse gas (GHG) emission loads and compensation from different design solutions applied in Norwegian single-family ZEB pilot buildings and selected sensitivity studies. The objective is to see if a previously developed ZEB model (2011) can be redesigned to achieve a life cycle energy and material emission balance (ZEB-OM), which previously was not achieved. Five different design parameters are evaluated: area efficiency, embodied emissions in the envelope, insulation thickness, heating systems and different roof forms with respect to the photovoltaic area. Embodied emissions reductions were possible in the ground foundation, from around 1 kg CO2/m2 to 0.6 kg CO2/m2 per year. Both models are able to compensate for all operational emissions. The new model is in addition able to compensate for 60% of embodied emissions, whereas the previous model only could compensate for 5%. The new model does not reach the life cycle energy and material balance. The paper presents and discusses different approaches for achieving the ZEB-OM balance. Further concept model optimization is needed.
KW - Embodied emissions
KW - Life cycle
KW - Residential
KW - Single-family
KW - Zero emission buildings
KW - Case studies
KW - Pilot buildings
U2 - 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.02.046
DO - 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.02.046
M3 - Article
VL - 168
SP - 457
EP - 469
JO - Energy and Buildings
JF - Energy and Buildings
SN - 0378-7788
ER -