Investigating the frequency of intrusive memories after 24 hours using a visuospatial interference intervention: a follow-up and extension

Tim Brennen, Ines Blix, Alexander Nissen, Emily A Holmes, Martine Skumlien, Øivind Solberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a need for effective, low-cost, readily available measures for reducing trauma symptoms so that people exposed to potentially traumatic events can receive help more quickly. A previous study reported that performing an intervention including a visuospatial task shortly after a reminder of a series of unpleasant film clips seen 24 hours earlier reduced the number of intrusive memories over the following week.

OBJECTIVE: This study reports a follow-up and extension of the earlier promising finding. The prediction was that participants performing the visuospatial task immediately after the reminder would report fewer intrusions compared to three other groups who 1) performed no task, and novel conditions who 2) performed the task before the reminder, and 3) performed the task 90 minutes after the reminder.

METHOD: A trauma-analogue method was used, where students ( N = 200) watched a series of short films with unpleasant material. Over the following week, they were asked to write down any intrusive memories they experienced in a diary. On the second day they returned to the lab and saw static reminders of the films. They were then randomly allocated to condition, recorded intrusive memories over the following days and returned to the lab for final testing on Day 8.

RESULTS: A total of 49 participants did not report any intrusions and were excluded from the analyses. Two more participants were excluded as outliers, leaving a final sample of n = 149. Despite using largely the same materials as the original study there were no significant differences in the number of intrusive memories between the four groups post intervention.

CONCLUSIONS: Possible explanations include the effect not being as robust as expected, a low number of intrusions across groups, baseline differences in attention, and minor but potentially important differences in procedure between this and the original study.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1953788
JournalEuropean Journal of Psychotraumatology
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Aug 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding
The study was financed by internal funds from the Department of Psychology, University of Oslo and the Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies

Data availability statement
The data that support the findings of this study are openly available at http://10.0.68.197/OSF.IO/68VX5

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Attention/physiology
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Memory/physiology
  • Mental Recall/physiology
  • Motion Pictures
  • Norway
  • Self Report
  • Spatial Processing/physiology
  • Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/therapy
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Video Games
  • Wounds and Injuries/therapy
  • Young Adult

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Investigating the frequency of intrusive memories after 24 hours using a visuospatial interference intervention: a follow-up and extension'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this