Intrinsic flexibility of the EMT zeolite framework under pressure

Antony Nearchou, Mero Lee U. Cornelius, Jonathan M. Skelton, Zöe L. Jones, Andrew B. Cairns, Ines E. Collings, Paul R. Raithby, Stephen A. Wells, Asel Sartbaeva

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The roles of organic additives in the assembly and crystallisation of zeolites are still not fully understood. This is important when attempting to prepare novel frameworks to produce new zeolites. We consider 18-crown-6 ether (18C6) as an additive, which has previously been shown to differentiate between the zeolite EMC-2 (EMT) and faujasite (FAU) frameworks. However, it is unclear whether this distinction is dictated by influences on the metastable free-energy landscape or geometric templating. Using high-pressure synchrotron X-ray diffraction, we have observed that the presence of 18C6 does not impact the EMT framework flexibility—agreeing with our previous geometric simulations and suggesting that 18C6 does not behave as a geometric template. This was further studied by computational modelling using solid-state density-functional theory and lattice dynamics calculations. It is shown that the lattice energy of FAU is lower than EMT, but is strongly impacted by the presence of solvent/guest molecules in the framework. Furthermore, the EMT topology possesses a greater vibrational entropy and is stabilised by free energy at a finite temperature. Overall, these findings demonstrate that the role of the 18C6 additive is to influence the free energy of crystallisation to assemble the EMT framework as opposed to FAU.

LanguageEnglish
Article number641
JournalMolecules
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
StatusPublished - 12 Feb 2019

Keywords

  • Compressibility
  • Crystallization
  • EMC-2
  • Flexibility window
  • Framework materials
  • High pressure
  • Lattice dynamics
  • X-ray diffraction
  • Zeolite

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Chemistry (miscellaneous)
  • Molecular Medicine
  • Pharmaceutical Science
  • Drug Discovery
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
  • Organic Chemistry

Cite this

Nearchou, A., Cornelius, M. L. U., Skelton, J. M., Jones, Z. L., Cairns, A. B., Collings, I. E., ... Sartbaeva, A. (2019). Intrinsic flexibility of the EMT zeolite framework under pressure. Molecules, 24(3), [641]. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24030641

Intrinsic flexibility of the EMT zeolite framework under pressure. / Nearchou, Antony; Cornelius, Mero Lee U.; Skelton, Jonathan M.; Jones, Zöe L.; Cairns, Andrew B.; Collings, Ines E.; Raithby, Paul R.; Wells, Stephen A.; Sartbaeva, Asel.

In: Molecules, Vol. 24, No. 3, 641, 12.02.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nearchou, A, Cornelius, MLU, Skelton, JM, Jones, ZL, Cairns, AB, Collings, IE, Raithby, PR, Wells, SA & Sartbaeva, A 2019, 'Intrinsic flexibility of the EMT zeolite framework under pressure', Molecules, vol. 24, no. 3, 641. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24030641
Nearchou A, Cornelius MLU, Skelton JM, Jones ZL, Cairns AB, Collings IE et al. Intrinsic flexibility of the EMT zeolite framework under pressure. Molecules. 2019 Feb 12;24(3). 641. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24030641
Nearchou, Antony ; Cornelius, Mero Lee U. ; Skelton, Jonathan M. ; Jones, Zöe L. ; Cairns, Andrew B. ; Collings, Ines E. ; Raithby, Paul R. ; Wells, Stephen A. ; Sartbaeva, Asel. / Intrinsic flexibility of the EMT zeolite framework under pressure. In: Molecules. 2019 ; Vol. 24, No. 3.
@article{2b13b8e4c6b9420aaa0faafa4e4aab90,
title = "Intrinsic flexibility of the EMT zeolite framework under pressure",
abstract = "The roles of organic additives in the assembly and crystallisation of zeolites are still not fully understood. This is important when attempting to prepare novel frameworks to produce new zeolites. We consider 18-crown-6 ether (18C6) as an additive, which has previously been shown to differentiate between the zeolite EMC-2 (EMT) and faujasite (FAU) frameworks. However, it is unclear whether this distinction is dictated by influences on the metastable free-energy landscape or geometric templating. Using high-pressure synchrotron X-ray diffraction, we have observed that the presence of 18C6 does not impact the EMT framework flexibility—agreeing with our previous geometric simulations and suggesting that 18C6 does not behave as a geometric template. This was further studied by computational modelling using solid-state density-functional theory and lattice dynamics calculations. It is shown that the lattice energy of FAU is lower than EMT, but is strongly impacted by the presence of solvent/guest molecules in the framework. Furthermore, the EMT topology possesses a greater vibrational entropy and is stabilised by free energy at a finite temperature. Overall, these findings demonstrate that the role of the 18C6 additive is to influence the free energy of crystallisation to assemble the EMT framework as opposed to FAU.",
keywords = "Compressibility, Crystallization, EMC-2, Flexibility window, Framework materials, High pressure, Lattice dynamics, X-ray diffraction, Zeolite",
author = "Antony Nearchou and Cornelius, {Mero Lee U.} and Skelton, {Jonathan M.} and Jones, {Z{\"o}e L.} and Cairns, {Andrew B.} and Collings, {Ines E.} and Raithby, {Paul R.} and Wells, {Stephen A.} and Asel Sartbaeva",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "12",
doi = "10.3390/molecules24030641",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
journal = "Molecules",
issn = "1420-3049",
publisher = "MDPI",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intrinsic flexibility of the EMT zeolite framework under pressure

AU - Nearchou, Antony

AU - Cornelius, Mero Lee U.

AU - Skelton, Jonathan M.

AU - Jones, Zöe L.

AU - Cairns, Andrew B.

AU - Collings, Ines E.

AU - Raithby, Paul R.

AU - Wells, Stephen A.

AU - Sartbaeva, Asel

PY - 2019/2/12

Y1 - 2019/2/12

N2 - The roles of organic additives in the assembly and crystallisation of zeolites are still not fully understood. This is important when attempting to prepare novel frameworks to produce new zeolites. We consider 18-crown-6 ether (18C6) as an additive, which has previously been shown to differentiate between the zeolite EMC-2 (EMT) and faujasite (FAU) frameworks. However, it is unclear whether this distinction is dictated by influences on the metastable free-energy landscape or geometric templating. Using high-pressure synchrotron X-ray diffraction, we have observed that the presence of 18C6 does not impact the EMT framework flexibility—agreeing with our previous geometric simulations and suggesting that 18C6 does not behave as a geometric template. This was further studied by computational modelling using solid-state density-functional theory and lattice dynamics calculations. It is shown that the lattice energy of FAU is lower than EMT, but is strongly impacted by the presence of solvent/guest molecules in the framework. Furthermore, the EMT topology possesses a greater vibrational entropy and is stabilised by free energy at a finite temperature. Overall, these findings demonstrate that the role of the 18C6 additive is to influence the free energy of crystallisation to assemble the EMT framework as opposed to FAU.

AB - The roles of organic additives in the assembly and crystallisation of zeolites are still not fully understood. This is important when attempting to prepare novel frameworks to produce new zeolites. We consider 18-crown-6 ether (18C6) as an additive, which has previously been shown to differentiate between the zeolite EMC-2 (EMT) and faujasite (FAU) frameworks. However, it is unclear whether this distinction is dictated by influences on the metastable free-energy landscape or geometric templating. Using high-pressure synchrotron X-ray diffraction, we have observed that the presence of 18C6 does not impact the EMT framework flexibility—agreeing with our previous geometric simulations and suggesting that 18C6 does not behave as a geometric template. This was further studied by computational modelling using solid-state density-functional theory and lattice dynamics calculations. It is shown that the lattice energy of FAU is lower than EMT, but is strongly impacted by the presence of solvent/guest molecules in the framework. Furthermore, the EMT topology possesses a greater vibrational entropy and is stabilised by free energy at a finite temperature. Overall, these findings demonstrate that the role of the 18C6 additive is to influence the free energy of crystallisation to assemble the EMT framework as opposed to FAU.

KW - Compressibility

KW - Crystallization

KW - EMC-2

KW - Flexibility window

KW - Framework materials

KW - High pressure

KW - Lattice dynamics

KW - X-ray diffraction

KW - Zeolite

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061533442&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/molecules24030641

DO - 10.3390/molecules24030641

M3 - Article

VL - 24

JO - Molecules

T2 - Molecules

JF - Molecules

SN - 1420-3049

IS - 3

M1 - 641

ER -