Abstract
The argument challenges dominant approaches to education for sustainability through adopting a theoretical framework grounded in broad ontological realism but epistemological relativism, consonant with both Darwin and a fully semiotic account of living and learning (Stables & Gough, 2006; Stables, 2005, 2006). This framework draws together strands from a number of areas of academic inquiry, and is set out in an introductory section. Implications of the resulting ontological/epistemological juxtapositioning are then explored, and applied in relation to educational aspects of a number of environmental examples, most particularly climate change. In the light of this, further discussion of the relationship between the natural world and human meaning-making leads to a number of conclusions regarding the most appropriate curricular approach for environmental or sustainability education.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 368-385 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Curriculum Inquiry |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 9 Jun 2012 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2012 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Interpretation as adaptation: education for survival in uncertain times'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS