International students’ and employers’ use of rankings

a cross-national analysis

Manuel Souto-Otero, Jurgen Enders

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)
69 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The article examines, primarily based on large-scale survey data, the functionalist proposition that HE customers, students and employers, demand rankings to be able to adopt informed decisions on where to study and who to recruit respectively. This is contrasted to a Weberian ‘conflict’ perspective on rankings in which positional competition is key. The article concludes that rankings are better understood as instruments in positional competition for a minority of global players. They are a crucial source of information only for particular groups of international students and employers. The empirical analysis further suggests that the state of economic development, cultural aspects and the availability of top-ranked institutions in the home HE system are important factors in explaining differences in the importance of rankings across countries. We conclude by arguing that national governments and HE institutions should re-visit the assumption of a wide-spread importance of rankings for students and employers.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)783-810
Number of pages27
JournalStudies in Higher Education
Volume42
Issue number4
Early online date27 Oct 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • rankings
  • comparative study
  • data analysis
  • educational policy
  • egalitarianism
  • positional competition

Cite this

International students’ and employers’ use of rankings : a cross-national analysis. / Souto-Otero, Manuel; Enders, Jurgen.

In: Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 42, No. 4, 2017, p. 783-810.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8bba6ac2b3d0427a9564bb5294da6e6e,
title = "International students’ and employers’ use of rankings: a cross-national analysis",
abstract = "The article examines, primarily based on large-scale survey data, the functionalist proposition that HE customers, students and employers, demand rankings to be able to adopt informed decisions on where to study and who to recruit respectively. This is contrasted to a Weberian ‘conflict’ perspective on rankings in which positional competition is key. The article concludes that rankings are better understood as instruments in positional competition for a minority of global players. They are a crucial source of information only for particular groups of international students and employers. The empirical analysis further suggests that the state of economic development, cultural aspects and the availability of top-ranked institutions in the home HE system are important factors in explaining differences in the importance of rankings across countries. We conclude by arguing that national governments and HE institutions should re-visit the assumption of a wide-spread importance of rankings for students and employers.",
keywords = "rankings, comparative study, data analysis, educational policy, egalitarianism, positional competition",
author = "Manuel Souto-Otero and Jurgen Enders",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/03075079.2015.1074672",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "783--810",
journal = "Studies in Higher Education",
issn = "0307-5079",
publisher = "Routledge Falmer",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - International students’ and employers’ use of rankings

T2 - a cross-national analysis

AU - Souto-Otero, Manuel

AU - Enders, Jurgen

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The article examines, primarily based on large-scale survey data, the functionalist proposition that HE customers, students and employers, demand rankings to be able to adopt informed decisions on where to study and who to recruit respectively. This is contrasted to a Weberian ‘conflict’ perspective on rankings in which positional competition is key. The article concludes that rankings are better understood as instruments in positional competition for a minority of global players. They are a crucial source of information only for particular groups of international students and employers. The empirical analysis further suggests that the state of economic development, cultural aspects and the availability of top-ranked institutions in the home HE system are important factors in explaining differences in the importance of rankings across countries. We conclude by arguing that national governments and HE institutions should re-visit the assumption of a wide-spread importance of rankings for students and employers.

AB - The article examines, primarily based on large-scale survey data, the functionalist proposition that HE customers, students and employers, demand rankings to be able to adopt informed decisions on where to study and who to recruit respectively. This is contrasted to a Weberian ‘conflict’ perspective on rankings in which positional competition is key. The article concludes that rankings are better understood as instruments in positional competition for a minority of global players. They are a crucial source of information only for particular groups of international students and employers. The empirical analysis further suggests that the state of economic development, cultural aspects and the availability of top-ranked institutions in the home HE system are important factors in explaining differences in the importance of rankings across countries. We conclude by arguing that national governments and HE institutions should re-visit the assumption of a wide-spread importance of rankings for students and employers.

KW - rankings

KW - comparative study

KW - data analysis

KW - educational policy

KW - egalitarianism

KW - positional competition

U2 - 10.1080/03075079.2015.1074672

DO - 10.1080/03075079.2015.1074672

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 783

EP - 810

JO - Studies in Higher Education

JF - Studies in Higher Education

SN - 0307-5079

IS - 4

ER -