Abstract
Geopolitical risk can change faster than multinational enterprises (MNEs) can restructure ownership, location, or control arrangements. New Internalization Theory (NIT) explains how firms redraw the internalization envelope when cross-border hazards change, but says less about how managers govern existing operations before reconfiguration becomes feasible. We examine this pre-reconfiguration stage and argue that managers use discretionary support spending as a short-run resilience tool. When perceived geopolitical risk (PGR) rises, managers preserve liquidity by delaying adjustable Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) commitments until current revenue clarifies near-term exposure. Using a quarterly panel of publicly listed firms headquartered in 35 OECD countries from 2008 to 2023, and measuring PGR from earnings-call transcripts, we find that downside PGR makes SG&A more responsive to contemporaneous revenue. A regression discontinuity in time design around the unexpected 2016 US presidential election result supports this interpretation. We advance NIT by identifying a pre-reconfiguration governance channel: managers preserve liquidity while making discretionary SG&A spending contingent on contemporaneous revenue. The mechanism is strongest when PGR aligns with the firm’s geographic footprint, SG&A spending can manage near-term exposure, and institutional conditions permit within-quarter adjustment.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Journal of International Business Studies |
| Publication status | Published - 14 Jul 2026 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Internalizing Geopolitical Risk: Discretionary Cost Adjustment as Within-Envelope Resilience in Multinational Enterprises'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS