Interactions, collaborations and breakdowns

Peter Johnson

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

What is the point of modelling anything - why don't we simply get on with the job of designing and building interactive systems using our intuitions, creative genius, experience and knowledge. This is an argument often put forward in certain areas. We do use all the above when we design and build systems and we still get them wrong, often in serious ways that mostly only cost in terns of time or money. Models do not necessarily allow us to avoid the mistakes and pitfalls of design, a model is only an abstraction over detail, a representation of something that we believe is of relevance, interest and/or concern. We have to be creative, ingenius, experienced and knowledgeable in our development and use of models in design. Models do not exist for themselves, and people who engage in developing and using models are not doing that purely for the purpose of developing or perpetuating the use of a particular model. In my view modelling is a way to further understanding, and as our understanding progresses so should the models we use. In this respect I want to consider how my understanding of interaction has progressed and with that my attempts to model aspects of interaction that I am trying to understand so that I might use that understanding to improve interaction design. That means that while task modelling has been and still is important it is not a be all and end all.
Original languageEnglish
Pages1-3
Number of pages3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2004
Event3rd Annual Conference on Task Models and Diagrams (TAMODIA 2004) - Prague, Czech Republic
Duration: 15 Nov 200416 Nov 2004

Conference

Conference3rd Annual Conference on Task Models and Diagrams (TAMODIA 2004)
CountryCzech Republic
CityPrague
Period15/11/0416/11/04

Fingerprint

Costs

Cite this

Johnson, P. (2004). Interactions, collaborations and breakdowns. 1-3. Paper presented at 3rd Annual Conference on Task Models and Diagrams (TAMODIA 2004), Prague, Czech Republic. https://doi.org/10.1145/1045446.1045448

Interactions, collaborations and breakdowns. / Johnson, Peter.

2004. 1-3 Paper presented at 3rd Annual Conference on Task Models and Diagrams (TAMODIA 2004), Prague, Czech Republic.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Johnson, P 2004, 'Interactions, collaborations and breakdowns' Paper presented at 3rd Annual Conference on Task Models and Diagrams (TAMODIA 2004), Prague, Czech Republic, 15/11/04 - 16/11/04, pp. 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1145/1045446.1045448
Johnson P. Interactions, collaborations and breakdowns. 2004. Paper presented at 3rd Annual Conference on Task Models and Diagrams (TAMODIA 2004), Prague, Czech Republic. https://doi.org/10.1145/1045446.1045448
Johnson, Peter. / Interactions, collaborations and breakdowns. Paper presented at 3rd Annual Conference on Task Models and Diagrams (TAMODIA 2004), Prague, Czech Republic.3 p.
@conference{b521cd3eebb44ba695296b674b6bab81,
title = "Interactions, collaborations and breakdowns",
abstract = "What is the point of modelling anything - why don't we simply get on with the job of designing and building interactive systems using our intuitions, creative genius, experience and knowledge. This is an argument often put forward in certain areas. We do use all the above when we design and build systems and we still get them wrong, often in serious ways that mostly only cost in terns of time or money. Models do not necessarily allow us to avoid the mistakes and pitfalls of design, a model is only an abstraction over detail, a representation of something that we believe is of relevance, interest and/or concern. We have to be creative, ingenius, experienced and knowledgeable in our development and use of models in design. Models do not exist for themselves, and people who engage in developing and using models are not doing that purely for the purpose of developing or perpetuating the use of a particular model. In my view modelling is a way to further understanding, and as our understanding progresses so should the models we use. In this respect I want to consider how my understanding of interaction has progressed and with that my attempts to model aspects of interaction that I am trying to understand so that I might use that understanding to improve interaction design. That means that while task modelling has been and still is important it is not a be all and end all.",
author = "Peter Johnson",
year = "2004",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1145/1045446.1045448",
language = "English",
pages = "1--3",
note = "3rd Annual Conference on Task Models and Diagrams (TAMODIA 2004) ; Conference date: 15-11-2004 Through 16-11-2004",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Interactions, collaborations and breakdowns

AU - Johnson, Peter

PY - 2004/11

Y1 - 2004/11

N2 - What is the point of modelling anything - why don't we simply get on with the job of designing and building interactive systems using our intuitions, creative genius, experience and knowledge. This is an argument often put forward in certain areas. We do use all the above when we design and build systems and we still get them wrong, often in serious ways that mostly only cost in terns of time or money. Models do not necessarily allow us to avoid the mistakes and pitfalls of design, a model is only an abstraction over detail, a representation of something that we believe is of relevance, interest and/or concern. We have to be creative, ingenius, experienced and knowledgeable in our development and use of models in design. Models do not exist for themselves, and people who engage in developing and using models are not doing that purely for the purpose of developing or perpetuating the use of a particular model. In my view modelling is a way to further understanding, and as our understanding progresses so should the models we use. In this respect I want to consider how my understanding of interaction has progressed and with that my attempts to model aspects of interaction that I am trying to understand so that I might use that understanding to improve interaction design. That means that while task modelling has been and still is important it is not a be all and end all.

AB - What is the point of modelling anything - why don't we simply get on with the job of designing and building interactive systems using our intuitions, creative genius, experience and knowledge. This is an argument often put forward in certain areas. We do use all the above when we design and build systems and we still get them wrong, often in serious ways that mostly only cost in terns of time or money. Models do not necessarily allow us to avoid the mistakes and pitfalls of design, a model is only an abstraction over detail, a representation of something that we believe is of relevance, interest and/or concern. We have to be creative, ingenius, experienced and knowledgeable in our development and use of models in design. Models do not exist for themselves, and people who engage in developing and using models are not doing that purely for the purpose of developing or perpetuating the use of a particular model. In my view modelling is a way to further understanding, and as our understanding progresses so should the models we use. In this respect I want to consider how my understanding of interaction has progressed and with that my attempts to model aspects of interaction that I am trying to understand so that I might use that understanding to improve interaction design. That means that while task modelling has been and still is important it is not a be all and end all.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1045446.1045448

U2 - 10.1145/1045446.1045448

DO - 10.1145/1045446.1045448

M3 - Paper

SP - 1

EP - 3

ER -