Intentions versus enactment:: making sense of policy and practice for teaching English as an additional language.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between policy and practice for the teaching of children with English as an additional language (EAL) in English schools. It contributes original insights into how teachers are supported or restricted in developing the nuances of pedagogy needed for children new to English. The reported research took place against a backdrop of rising numbers of migrant children with EAL in English schools, partnered with a significant reduction in educational funding for these children and a limited focus on EAL in educational policy. Policy documents for EAL from two contrasting but contiguous periods of government were compared through an intertextual lens, and this was set alongside responses to a survey of teachers about their sense-making of policies and practices for EAL. Findings contribute to much-needed practical understanding of how policy enactment in practice may be divorced from policy makers’ intentions. Outcomes provide a timely evidence-base which enhances our grasp of the complexity of teachers’ professional lives in relation to children from different linguistic backgrounds. Moreover, analysis uncovers where policymakers’ discourse reflects how children with EAL are perceived and received in their host countries during a period of hitherto unseen high levels of migration.

LanguageEnglish
Pages410-427
Number of pages18
JournalLanguage and Education
Volume32
Issue number5
Early online date30 May 2018
DOIs
StatusPublished - 3 Sep 2018

Fingerprint

Teaching
language
teacher
educational policy
school
Teaching English
Intentions
English as an Additional Language
Enactment
Sensemaking
migrant
funding
migration
linguistics
discourse
evidence

Keywords

  • EAL
  • Language policy
  • education policy enactment
  • migration
  • sense-making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Intentions versus enactment: making sense of policy and practice for teaching English as an additional language. / Flynn, Naomi; Curdt-Christiansen, Xiao Lan.

In: Language and Education, Vol. 32, No. 5, 03.09.2018, p. 410-427.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7c2006058f9248d4929c95d1004452de,
title = "Intentions versus enactment:: making sense of policy and practice for teaching English as an additional language.",
abstract = "This article examines the relationship between policy and practice for the teaching of children with English as an additional language (EAL) in English schools. It contributes original insights into how teachers are supported or restricted in developing the nuances of pedagogy needed for children new to English. The reported research took place against a backdrop of rising numbers of migrant children with EAL in English schools, partnered with a significant reduction in educational funding for these children and a limited focus on EAL in educational policy. Policy documents for EAL from two contrasting but contiguous periods of government were compared through an intertextual lens, and this was set alongside responses to a survey of teachers about their sense-making of policies and practices for EAL. Findings contribute to much-needed practical understanding of how policy enactment in practice may be divorced from policy makers’ intentions. Outcomes provide a timely evidence-base which enhances our grasp of the complexity of teachers’ professional lives in relation to children from different linguistic backgrounds. Moreover, analysis uncovers where policymakers’ discourse reflects how children with EAL are perceived and received in their host countries during a period of hitherto unseen high levels of migration.",
keywords = "EAL, Language policy, education policy enactment, migration, sense-making",
author = "Naomi Flynn and Curdt-Christiansen, {Xiao Lan}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/09500782.2018.1475484",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "410--427",
journal = "Language and Education",
issn = "0950-0782",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intentions versus enactment:

T2 - Language and Education

AU - Flynn, Naomi

AU - Curdt-Christiansen, Xiao Lan

PY - 2018/9/3

Y1 - 2018/9/3

N2 - This article examines the relationship between policy and practice for the teaching of children with English as an additional language (EAL) in English schools. It contributes original insights into how teachers are supported or restricted in developing the nuances of pedagogy needed for children new to English. The reported research took place against a backdrop of rising numbers of migrant children with EAL in English schools, partnered with a significant reduction in educational funding for these children and a limited focus on EAL in educational policy. Policy documents for EAL from two contrasting but contiguous periods of government were compared through an intertextual lens, and this was set alongside responses to a survey of teachers about their sense-making of policies and practices for EAL. Findings contribute to much-needed practical understanding of how policy enactment in practice may be divorced from policy makers’ intentions. Outcomes provide a timely evidence-base which enhances our grasp of the complexity of teachers’ professional lives in relation to children from different linguistic backgrounds. Moreover, analysis uncovers where policymakers’ discourse reflects how children with EAL are perceived and received in their host countries during a period of hitherto unseen high levels of migration.

AB - This article examines the relationship between policy and practice for the teaching of children with English as an additional language (EAL) in English schools. It contributes original insights into how teachers are supported or restricted in developing the nuances of pedagogy needed for children new to English. The reported research took place against a backdrop of rising numbers of migrant children with EAL in English schools, partnered with a significant reduction in educational funding for these children and a limited focus on EAL in educational policy. Policy documents for EAL from two contrasting but contiguous periods of government were compared through an intertextual lens, and this was set alongside responses to a survey of teachers about their sense-making of policies and practices for EAL. Findings contribute to much-needed practical understanding of how policy enactment in practice may be divorced from policy makers’ intentions. Outcomes provide a timely evidence-base which enhances our grasp of the complexity of teachers’ professional lives in relation to children from different linguistic backgrounds. Moreover, analysis uncovers where policymakers’ discourse reflects how children with EAL are perceived and received in their host countries during a period of hitherto unseen high levels of migration.

KW - EAL

KW - Language policy

KW - education policy enactment

KW - migration

KW - sense-making

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047792458&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09500782.2018.1475484

DO - 10.1080/09500782.2018.1475484

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 410

EP - 427

JO - Language and Education

JF - Language and Education

SN - 0950-0782

IS - 5

ER -