Intelligence and negation biases on the Conditional Inference task: A dual-processes analysis

N F Attridge, Matthew Inglis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
138 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We examined a large set of conditional inference data compiled from several previous studies and asked three questions: How is normative performance related to intelligence? Does negative conclusion bias stem from Type 1 or Type 2 processing? Does implicit negation bias stem from Type 1 or Type 2 processing? Our analysis demonstrated that rejecting denial of the antecedent and affirmation of the consequent inferences was positively correlated with intelligence, while endorsing modus tollens inferences was not; that the occurrence of negative conclusion bias was related to the extent of Type 2 processing; and that the occurrence of implicit negation bias was not related to the extent of Type 2 processing. We conclude that negative conclusion bias is, at least in part, a product of Type 2 processing, while implicit negation bias is not.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)454-471
Number of pages18
JournalThinking & Reasoning
Volume20
Issue number4
Early online date19 Mar 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Intelligence and negation biases on the Conditional Inference task: A dual-processes analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this