Institutional and Regulatory Frameworks of Privatisation and FDI: A Comparative Study between Egypt and Argentina

Rania Ihab Naguib

Research output: Working paper

682 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper aims at investigating the difference between the Egyptian and Argentinean approach to privatisation and FDI and how their different policies, institutions and regulations affected the progress of their respective privatisation programmes and FDI participation. The analysis indicates that, in Egypt, the legal framework of privatisation did not explicitly incorporate FDI participation. FDI regulations were developed separately from privatisation regulations. As a result, a foreign investor in Egypt is faced with multiple laws and multiple regulating agencies for FDI. Unlike in Argentina, the legal framework of privatisation explicitly incorporated the participation of FDI, and FDI regulations were totally liberalised. This explains why FDI participation in Argentine privatisation during 1989 – 2000 accounted for 63% of privatisation proceeds, while, in Egypt, FDI participation accounted for only 24% of privatisation proceeds during 1993 – 2000.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationBath, U. K.
PublisherDepartment of Economics, University of Bath
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Publication series

NameBath Economics Research Working Papers
No.20/09

Keywords

  • Egypt
  • FDI
  • Argentina
  • regulations
  • Privatisation

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Institutional and Regulatory Frameworks of Privatisation and FDI: A Comparative Study between Egypt and Argentina'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Naguib, R. I. (2009). Institutional and Regulatory Frameworks of Privatisation and FDI: A Comparative Study between Egypt and Argentina. (Bath Economics Research Working Papers; No. 20/09). Department of Economics, University of Bath.