Innovate or Imitate? Behavioural technological change

Cars Hommes, Paolo Zeppini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)
75 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We propose a behavioural model of technological change with evolutionary switching between costly innovators and free imitators, and study the endogenous interplay of innovation decisions, market price dynamics and technological progress. Innovation and imitation are strategic substitutes and exhibit negative feedback. Endogenous technological change is the cumulative outcome of innovation decisions. There are three scenarios: market breakdown, Schumpeterian rents and learning curves. The latter is characterised by an increasing fraction of innovators when demand is elastic, while inelastic demand allows technological progress with shrinking innovation effort. Model simulations are compared to stylised features of empirical data in two industrial sectors.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)308-324
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Economic Dynamics and Control
Volume48
Early online date14 Aug 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2014

Fingerprint

Technological change
Innovation
Innovators
Technological progress
Market price
Industrial sector
Strategic substitutes
Joseph Schumpeter
Negative feedback
Model simulation
Evolutionary
Imitation
Empirical data
Price dynamics
Rent
Endogenous technological change
Scenarios
Behavioral model
Breakdown
Learning curve

Cite this

Innovate or Imitate? Behavioural technological change. / Hommes, Cars; Zeppini, Paolo.

In: Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol. 48, 01.11.2014, p. 308-324.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{56fcc18187ff4b7280725627bd0d1242,
title = "Innovate or Imitate? Behavioural technological change",
abstract = "We propose a behavioural model of technological change with evolutionary switching between costly innovators and free imitators, and study the endogenous interplay of innovation decisions, market price dynamics and technological progress. Innovation and imitation are strategic substitutes and exhibit negative feedback. Endogenous technological change is the cumulative outcome of innovation decisions. There are three scenarios: market breakdown, Schumpeterian rents and learning curves. The latter is characterised by an increasing fraction of innovators when demand is elastic, while inelastic demand allows technological progress with shrinking innovation effort. Model simulations are compared to stylised features of empirical data in two industrial sectors.",
author = "Cars Hommes and Paolo Zeppini",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jedc.2014.08.005",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "308--324",
journal = "Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control",
issn = "0165-1889",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Innovate or Imitate? Behavioural technological change

AU - Hommes, Cars

AU - Zeppini, Paolo

PY - 2014/11/1

Y1 - 2014/11/1

N2 - We propose a behavioural model of technological change with evolutionary switching between costly innovators and free imitators, and study the endogenous interplay of innovation decisions, market price dynamics and technological progress. Innovation and imitation are strategic substitutes and exhibit negative feedback. Endogenous technological change is the cumulative outcome of innovation decisions. There are three scenarios: market breakdown, Schumpeterian rents and learning curves. The latter is characterised by an increasing fraction of innovators when demand is elastic, while inelastic demand allows technological progress with shrinking innovation effort. Model simulations are compared to stylised features of empirical data in two industrial sectors.

AB - We propose a behavioural model of technological change with evolutionary switching between costly innovators and free imitators, and study the endogenous interplay of innovation decisions, market price dynamics and technological progress. Innovation and imitation are strategic substitutes and exhibit negative feedback. Endogenous technological change is the cumulative outcome of innovation decisions. There are three scenarios: market breakdown, Schumpeterian rents and learning curves. The latter is characterised by an increasing fraction of innovators when demand is elastic, while inelastic demand allows technological progress with shrinking innovation effort. Model simulations are compared to stylised features of empirical data in two industrial sectors.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jedc.2014.08.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jedc.2014.08.005

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 308

EP - 324

JO - Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control

JF - Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control

SN - 0165-1889

ER -