Influence of surface geometry and the cam-post mechanism on the kinematics of total knee replacement

H. Pandit, T. Ward, D. Hollinghurst, D. J. Beard, H. S. Gill, N. P. Thomas, D. W. Murray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Abnormal sagittal kinematics after total knee replacement (TKR) can adversely affect functional outcome. Two important determinants of knee kinematics are component geometry and the presence or absence of a posterior-stabilising mechanism (cam-post). We investigated the influence of these variables by comparing the kinematics of a TKR with a polyradial femur with a single radius design, both with and without a cam-post mechanism.We assessed 55 patients, subdivided into four groups, who had undergone a TKR one year earlier by using an established fluoroscopy protocol in order to examine their kinematics in vivo. The kinematic profile was obtained by measuring the patellar tendon angle through the functional knee flexion range (0 degrees to 90 degrees ) and the results compared with 14 normal knees. All designs of TKR had abnormal sagittal kinematics compared with the normal knee. There was a significant (p <0.05) difference between those of the two TKRs near to full extension. The presence of the cam-post mechanism did not influence the kinematics for either TKR design. These differences suggest that surface geometry is a stronger determinant of kinematics than the presence or absence of a cam-post mechanism for these two designs. This may be because the cam-post mechanism is ineffective.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)940-945
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume
Volume87
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Biomechanical Phenomena
Knee
Patellar Ligament
Fluoroscopy
Femur

Cite this

Influence of surface geometry and the cam-post mechanism on the kinematics of total knee replacement. / Pandit, H.; Ward, T.; Hollinghurst, D.; Beard, D. J.; Gill, H. S.; Thomas, N. P.; Murray, D. W.

In: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol. 87, No. 7, 2005, p. 940-945.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pandit, H. ; Ward, T. ; Hollinghurst, D. ; Beard, D. J. ; Gill, H. S. ; Thomas, N. P. ; Murray, D. W. / Influence of surface geometry and the cam-post mechanism on the kinematics of total knee replacement. In: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume. 2005 ; Vol. 87, No. 7. pp. 940-945.
@article{e636605fadca43c8810962e85217bb2d,
title = "Influence of surface geometry and the cam-post mechanism on the kinematics of total knee replacement",
abstract = "Abnormal sagittal kinematics after total knee replacement (TKR) can adversely affect functional outcome. Two important determinants of knee kinematics are component geometry and the presence or absence of a posterior-stabilising mechanism (cam-post). We investigated the influence of these variables by comparing the kinematics of a TKR with a polyradial femur with a single radius design, both with and without a cam-post mechanism.We assessed 55 patients, subdivided into four groups, who had undergone a TKR one year earlier by using an established fluoroscopy protocol in order to examine their kinematics in vivo. The kinematic profile was obtained by measuring the patellar tendon angle through the functional knee flexion range (0 degrees to 90 degrees ) and the results compared with 14 normal knees. All designs of TKR had abnormal sagittal kinematics compared with the normal knee. There was a significant (p <0.05) difference between those of the two TKRs near to full extension. The presence of the cam-post mechanism did not influence the kinematics for either TKR design. These differences suggest that surface geometry is a stronger determinant of kinematics than the presence or absence of a cam-post mechanism for these two designs. This may be because the cam-post mechanism is ineffective.",
author = "H. Pandit and T. Ward and D. Hollinghurst and Beard, {D. J.} and Gill, {H. S.} and Thomas, {N. P.} and Murray, {D. W.}",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1302/0301-620X.87B7.15716",
language = "English",
volume = "87",
pages = "940--945",
journal = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume",
issn = "0301-620X",
publisher = "British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of surface geometry and the cam-post mechanism on the kinematics of total knee replacement

AU - Pandit, H.

AU - Ward, T.

AU - Hollinghurst, D.

AU - Beard, D. J.

AU - Gill, H. S.

AU - Thomas, N. P.

AU - Murray, D. W.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Abnormal sagittal kinematics after total knee replacement (TKR) can adversely affect functional outcome. Two important determinants of knee kinematics are component geometry and the presence or absence of a posterior-stabilising mechanism (cam-post). We investigated the influence of these variables by comparing the kinematics of a TKR with a polyradial femur with a single radius design, both with and without a cam-post mechanism.We assessed 55 patients, subdivided into four groups, who had undergone a TKR one year earlier by using an established fluoroscopy protocol in order to examine their kinematics in vivo. The kinematic profile was obtained by measuring the patellar tendon angle through the functional knee flexion range (0 degrees to 90 degrees ) and the results compared with 14 normal knees. All designs of TKR had abnormal sagittal kinematics compared with the normal knee. There was a significant (p <0.05) difference between those of the two TKRs near to full extension. The presence of the cam-post mechanism did not influence the kinematics for either TKR design. These differences suggest that surface geometry is a stronger determinant of kinematics than the presence or absence of a cam-post mechanism for these two designs. This may be because the cam-post mechanism is ineffective.

AB - Abnormal sagittal kinematics after total knee replacement (TKR) can adversely affect functional outcome. Two important determinants of knee kinematics are component geometry and the presence or absence of a posterior-stabilising mechanism (cam-post). We investigated the influence of these variables by comparing the kinematics of a TKR with a polyradial femur with a single radius design, both with and without a cam-post mechanism.We assessed 55 patients, subdivided into four groups, who had undergone a TKR one year earlier by using an established fluoroscopy protocol in order to examine their kinematics in vivo. The kinematic profile was obtained by measuring the patellar tendon angle through the functional knee flexion range (0 degrees to 90 degrees ) and the results compared with 14 normal knees. All designs of TKR had abnormal sagittal kinematics compared with the normal knee. There was a significant (p <0.05) difference between those of the two TKRs near to full extension. The presence of the cam-post mechanism did not influence the kinematics for either TKR design. These differences suggest that surface geometry is a stronger determinant of kinematics than the presence or absence of a cam-post mechanism for these two designs. This may be because the cam-post mechanism is ineffective.

UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=15972907

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.87B7.15716

U2 - 10.1302/0301-620X.87B7.15716

DO - 10.1302/0301-620X.87B7.15716

M3 - Article

VL - 87

SP - 940

EP - 945

JO - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume

JF - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume

SN - 0301-620X

IS - 7

ER -