Influence of component alignment on outcome for unicompartmental knee replacement

A. Gulati, R. Chau, D. J. Simpson, C. A. Dodd, H. S. Gill, D. W. Murray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study's aim was to assess the effect of component mal-alignment on outcome of Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR). Two hundred and eleven knees implanted with a medial UKR, using a minimally invasive approach, were followed up at a minimum of 4 years. Sagittal and frontal plane femoral and tibial component alignments were determined from antero-posterior and lateral radiographs. The cohort was divided into alignment groups which represented consecutive 2.5 degrees intervals over the range of measured values for femoral varus/valgus, femoral flexion/extension, tibial varus/valgus and tibial tilt. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and incidence of radiolucency (RL) were compared between alignment groups for each alignment parameter. In 98% of cases the femoral components were positioned between 10 degrees varus and 10 degrees valgus; all femoral components were within +/-10 degrees flexion. In 92% of cases the tibial components were positioned between +/-5 degrees varus/valgus and superior/inferior tilt (neutral tilt being 7 degrees). Within these ranges there were no significant differences in OKS or RL between the alignment groups; nor were there any differences between those at the extremes of component alignment compared to those in the inner ranges of alignment. We conclude that, because of the spherical femoral component, the Oxford UKR is tolerant to femoral mal-alignment of 10 degrees and tibial mal-alignment of 5 degrees.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)196-199
Number of pages4
JournalThe Knee
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Thigh
Knee
Incidence

Cite this

Influence of component alignment on outcome for unicompartmental knee replacement. / Gulati, A.; Chau, R.; Simpson, D. J.; Dodd, C. A.; Gill, H. S.; Murray, D. W.

In: The Knee, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2009, p. 196-199.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gulati, A, Chau, R, Simpson, DJ, Dodd, CA, Gill, HS & Murray, DW 2009, 'Influence of component alignment on outcome for unicompartmental knee replacement', The Knee, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 196-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2008.11.001
Gulati, A. ; Chau, R. ; Simpson, D. J. ; Dodd, C. A. ; Gill, H. S. ; Murray, D. W. / Influence of component alignment on outcome for unicompartmental knee replacement. In: The Knee. 2009 ; Vol. 16, No. 3. pp. 196-199.
@article{af87bad0ebdc4e488b0ba1375cffcfd5,
title = "Influence of component alignment on outcome for unicompartmental knee replacement",
abstract = "This study's aim was to assess the effect of component mal-alignment on outcome of Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR). Two hundred and eleven knees implanted with a medial UKR, using a minimally invasive approach, were followed up at a minimum of 4 years. Sagittal and frontal plane femoral and tibial component alignments were determined from antero-posterior and lateral radiographs. The cohort was divided into alignment groups which represented consecutive 2.5 degrees intervals over the range of measured values for femoral varus/valgus, femoral flexion/extension, tibial varus/valgus and tibial tilt. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and incidence of radiolucency (RL) were compared between alignment groups for each alignment parameter. In 98{\%} of cases the femoral components were positioned between 10 degrees varus and 10 degrees valgus; all femoral components were within +/-10 degrees flexion. In 92{\%} of cases the tibial components were positioned between +/-5 degrees varus/valgus and superior/inferior tilt (neutral tilt being 7 degrees). Within these ranges there were no significant differences in OKS or RL between the alignment groups; nor were there any differences between those at the extremes of component alignment compared to those in the inner ranges of alignment. We conclude that, because of the spherical femoral component, the Oxford UKR is tolerant to femoral mal-alignment of 10 degrees and tibial mal-alignment of 5 degrees.",
author = "A. Gulati and R. Chau and Simpson, {D. J.} and Dodd, {C. A.} and Gill, {H. S.} and Murray, {D. W.}",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1016/j.knee.2008.11.001",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "196--199",
journal = "The Knee",
issn = "0968-0160",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of component alignment on outcome for unicompartmental knee replacement

AU - Gulati, A.

AU - Chau, R.

AU - Simpson, D. J.

AU - Dodd, C. A.

AU - Gill, H. S.

AU - Murray, D. W.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - This study's aim was to assess the effect of component mal-alignment on outcome of Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR). Two hundred and eleven knees implanted with a medial UKR, using a minimally invasive approach, were followed up at a minimum of 4 years. Sagittal and frontal plane femoral and tibial component alignments were determined from antero-posterior and lateral radiographs. The cohort was divided into alignment groups which represented consecutive 2.5 degrees intervals over the range of measured values for femoral varus/valgus, femoral flexion/extension, tibial varus/valgus and tibial tilt. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and incidence of radiolucency (RL) were compared between alignment groups for each alignment parameter. In 98% of cases the femoral components were positioned between 10 degrees varus and 10 degrees valgus; all femoral components were within +/-10 degrees flexion. In 92% of cases the tibial components were positioned between +/-5 degrees varus/valgus and superior/inferior tilt (neutral tilt being 7 degrees). Within these ranges there were no significant differences in OKS or RL between the alignment groups; nor were there any differences between those at the extremes of component alignment compared to those in the inner ranges of alignment. We conclude that, because of the spherical femoral component, the Oxford UKR is tolerant to femoral mal-alignment of 10 degrees and tibial mal-alignment of 5 degrees.

AB - This study's aim was to assess the effect of component mal-alignment on outcome of Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR). Two hundred and eleven knees implanted with a medial UKR, using a minimally invasive approach, were followed up at a minimum of 4 years. Sagittal and frontal plane femoral and tibial component alignments were determined from antero-posterior and lateral radiographs. The cohort was divided into alignment groups which represented consecutive 2.5 degrees intervals over the range of measured values for femoral varus/valgus, femoral flexion/extension, tibial varus/valgus and tibial tilt. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and incidence of radiolucency (RL) were compared between alignment groups for each alignment parameter. In 98% of cases the femoral components were positioned between 10 degrees varus and 10 degrees valgus; all femoral components were within +/-10 degrees flexion. In 92% of cases the tibial components were positioned between +/-5 degrees varus/valgus and superior/inferior tilt (neutral tilt being 7 degrees). Within these ranges there were no significant differences in OKS or RL between the alignment groups; nor were there any differences between those at the extremes of component alignment compared to those in the inner ranges of alignment. We conclude that, because of the spherical femoral component, the Oxford UKR is tolerant to femoral mal-alignment of 10 degrees and tibial mal-alignment of 5 degrees.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65049083624&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=19042132

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2008.11.001

U2 - 10.1016/j.knee.2008.11.001

DO - 10.1016/j.knee.2008.11.001

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 196

EP - 199

JO - The Knee

JF - The Knee

SN - 0968-0160

IS - 3

ER -