Abstract

Unhealthy commodity industries (UCIs) such as tobacco, alcohol, gambling, ultra-processed food and beverage producers are known to influence policy-making to advance their interests, often to the detriment of public health goals. This study mapped the complex system underpinning UCI’s influence on public health policy formulation in the UK and identified potential interventions to shift the system towards being able to better attain public health goals. We conducted a participatory systems mapping workshop with ten experts to build a causal loop diagram (CLD) and identify potential interventions to address UCI’s influence on public health policy development. The resulting CLD depicts a highly interconnected and reinforcing system driving UCI’s involvement in public health policy formulation across five thematic areas. Among the most connected elements were the ‘dominance of market mechanisms’, ‘perception of partnership as good governance principle’, ‘industry involvement lending perceived legitimacy to the policy formulation process’, ‘industry is seen as part of the solution’ and ‘industry ties to policy-makers’. Participants identified a total of 22 interventions within this system. Analysis of the CLD and interventions identified the potential for two key paradigmatic changes in this complex system: de-normalizing the perception of unhealthy commodity industry actors as legitimate stakeholders in policy formulation; and prioritizing public health and wellbeing objectives over profit and economic gain. In order to shift the system towards better attaining public health goals, interventions should reinforce each other and be supportive of these two key paradigmatic shifts.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberdaae139
JournalHealth Promotion International
Volume39
Issue number6
Early online date21 Nov 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2024

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all participants for their time and invaluable expertise. The authors would also like to thank Jacqueline Oliver and Prof Diane Finegood for their input, particularly on the methods and analysis

Funding

This work was supported by PhD funding from the University of Bath, in affiliation with the SPECTRUM consortium (MR/S037519/1). SPECTRUM is funded by the UK Prevention Research Partnership (UKPRP). UKPRP is an initiative funded by the British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council, Health and Social Care Research and Development Division (Welsh Government), Medical Research Council, National Institute for Health Research, Natural Environment Research Council, Public Health Agency (Northern Ireland), The Health Foundation and Wellcome Trust.

FundersFunder number
Natural Environment Research Council
Economic and Social Research Council
Medical Research Council
Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Department for Employment and Learning, Northern Ireland
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Public Health Agency
The Wellcome Trust
Cancer Research UK
British Heart Foundation
Health Foundation
Health and Social Care Research and Development Division
University of BathMR/S037519/1
University of Bath

Keywords

  • commercial determinants of health
  • corporate political activity
  • health policy
  • multi-stakeholderism
  • non-communicable diseases
  • unhealthy commodity industries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Industry influence on public health policy formulation in the UK: a complex systems approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this