Individual differences in prejudice and associative versus rule-based forms of transitive reasoning

Grzegorz Sedek, Kinga Piber-Dabrowska, Gregory R. Maio, Ulrich von Hecker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two experiments examined whether individual differences in prejudice are associated with different reasoning styles when targets and nontargets of prejudice are processed in the same context. High-prejudice and low-prejudice participants studied pairwise relations between four persons (one a prejudice target, three nontargets). Stereotypes were made salient by using specific ethnic names and stereotypic traits to define relations between the targets. Relations between the persons were always stereotype congruent in Experiment 1, whereas they were sometimes stereotype incongruent in Experiment 2. We examined study time, relational memory, and transitive reasoning in both experiments. The results of both experiments indicated that the high-prejudice participants studied sets of relations presented to them faster than did the low-prejudice participants. The high-prejudice participants were also more likely to show impaired relational memory and reasoning about nontarget persons but no such limitations with respect to target persons. This novel evidence that prejudice might substantially impair memory and transitive reasoning processes about nontarget persons is discussed in the light of alternative theoretical frameworks in the social cognition and emotion domains.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)853-865
Number of pages13
JournalEuropean Journal of Social Psychology
Volume41
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2011

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Individual differences in prejudice and associative versus rule-based forms of transitive reasoning. / Sedek, Grzegorz; Piber-Dabrowska, Kinga; Maio, Gregory R.; von Hecker, Ulrich.

In: European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 41, No. 7, 01.12.2011, p. 853-865.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sedek, Grzegorz ; Piber-Dabrowska, Kinga ; Maio, Gregory R. ; von Hecker, Ulrich. / Individual differences in prejudice and associative versus rule-based forms of transitive reasoning. In: European Journal of Social Psychology. 2011 ; Vol. 41, No. 7. pp. 853-865.
@article{c5adf51c6ce548ee953412cc38291834,
title = "Individual differences in prejudice and associative versus rule-based forms of transitive reasoning",
abstract = "Two experiments examined whether individual differences in prejudice are associated with different reasoning styles when targets and nontargets of prejudice are processed in the same context. High-prejudice and low-prejudice participants studied pairwise relations between four persons (one a prejudice target, three nontargets). Stereotypes were made salient by using specific ethnic names and stereotypic traits to define relations between the targets. Relations between the persons were always stereotype congruent in Experiment 1, whereas they were sometimes stereotype incongruent in Experiment 2. We examined study time, relational memory, and transitive reasoning in both experiments. The results of both experiments indicated that the high-prejudice participants studied sets of relations presented to them faster than did the low-prejudice participants. The high-prejudice participants were also more likely to show impaired relational memory and reasoning about nontarget persons but no such limitations with respect to target persons. This novel evidence that prejudice might substantially impair memory and transitive reasoning processes about nontarget persons is discussed in the light of alternative theoretical frameworks in the social cognition and emotion domains.",
author = "Grzegorz Sedek and Kinga Piber-Dabrowska and Maio, {Gregory R.} and {von Hecker}, Ulrich",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ejsp.830",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "853--865",
journal = "European Journal of Social Psychology",
issn = "0046-2772",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Individual differences in prejudice and associative versus rule-based forms of transitive reasoning

AU - Sedek, Grzegorz

AU - Piber-Dabrowska, Kinga

AU - Maio, Gregory R.

AU - von Hecker, Ulrich

PY - 2011/12/1

Y1 - 2011/12/1

N2 - Two experiments examined whether individual differences in prejudice are associated with different reasoning styles when targets and nontargets of prejudice are processed in the same context. High-prejudice and low-prejudice participants studied pairwise relations between four persons (one a prejudice target, three nontargets). Stereotypes were made salient by using specific ethnic names and stereotypic traits to define relations between the targets. Relations between the persons were always stereotype congruent in Experiment 1, whereas they were sometimes stereotype incongruent in Experiment 2. We examined study time, relational memory, and transitive reasoning in both experiments. The results of both experiments indicated that the high-prejudice participants studied sets of relations presented to them faster than did the low-prejudice participants. The high-prejudice participants were also more likely to show impaired relational memory and reasoning about nontarget persons but no such limitations with respect to target persons. This novel evidence that prejudice might substantially impair memory and transitive reasoning processes about nontarget persons is discussed in the light of alternative theoretical frameworks in the social cognition and emotion domains.

AB - Two experiments examined whether individual differences in prejudice are associated with different reasoning styles when targets and nontargets of prejudice are processed in the same context. High-prejudice and low-prejudice participants studied pairwise relations between four persons (one a prejudice target, three nontargets). Stereotypes were made salient by using specific ethnic names and stereotypic traits to define relations between the targets. Relations between the persons were always stereotype congruent in Experiment 1, whereas they were sometimes stereotype incongruent in Experiment 2. We examined study time, relational memory, and transitive reasoning in both experiments. The results of both experiments indicated that the high-prejudice participants studied sets of relations presented to them faster than did the low-prejudice participants. The high-prejudice participants were also more likely to show impaired relational memory and reasoning about nontarget persons but no such limitations with respect to target persons. This novel evidence that prejudice might substantially impair memory and transitive reasoning processes about nontarget persons is discussed in the light of alternative theoretical frameworks in the social cognition and emotion domains.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82155197205&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ejsp.830

DO - 10.1002/ejsp.830

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 853

EP - 865

JO - European Journal of Social Psychology

JF - European Journal of Social Psychology

SN - 0046-2772

IS - 7

ER -