Increasing cognitive inhibition with a difficult prior task: implications for mathematical thinking

Nina Attridge, Matthew Inglis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 8 Citations

Abstract

Dual-process theories posit two distinct types of cognitive processing: Type 1, which does not use working memory making it fast and automatic, and Type 2, which does use working memory making it slow and effortful. Mathematics often relies on the inhibition of pervasive Type 1 processing to apply new skills or knowledge that require Type 2 processing. In two studies, we demonstrate that giving participants a difficult task (Raven’s Matrices) before a task that requires the inhibition of intuitive responses (the Cognitive Reflection Test) significantly improves performance. Our findings suggest that encountering a difficult task that requires Type 2 processing before completing a task that requires inhibition of Type 1 processing may encourage an enduring ‘Type 2’ mindset, whereby participants are more likely to spontaneously use Type 2 processing for a period of time. Implications for mathematics education are discussed.
LanguageEnglish
Pages723-734
Number of pages12
JournalZDM Mathematics Education
Volume47
Issue number5
Early online date19 Dec 2014
DOIs
StatusPublished - Sep 2015

Fingerprint

mathematics
Working Memory
performance
education
Mathematics Education
Period of time
Intuitive
Likely
Distinct
Demonstrate
time

Cite this

Increasing cognitive inhibition with a difficult prior task : implications for mathematical thinking. / Attridge, Nina; Inglis, Matthew.

In: ZDM Mathematics Education, Vol. 47, No. 5, 09.2015, p. 723-734.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{70e9a495910949c2bc64277c445cc8e7,
title = "Increasing cognitive inhibition with a difficult prior task: implications for mathematical thinking",
abstract = "Dual-process theories posit two distinct types of cognitive processing: Type 1, which does not use working memory making it fast and automatic, and Type 2, which does use working memory making it slow and effortful. Mathematics often relies on the inhibition of pervasive Type 1 processing to apply new skills or knowledge that require Type 2 processing. In two studies, we demonstrate that giving participants a difficult task (Raven’s Matrices) before a task that requires the inhibition of intuitive responses (the Cognitive Reflection Test) significantly improves performance. Our findings suggest that encountering a difficult task that requires Type 2 processing before completing a task that requires inhibition of Type 1 processing may encourage an enduring ‘Type 2’ mindset, whereby participants are more likely to spontaneously use Type 2 processing for a period of time. Implications for mathematics education are discussed.",
author = "Nina Attridge and Matthew Inglis",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s11858-014-0656-1",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "723--734",
journal = "ZDM Mathematics Education",
issn = "1863-9690",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Increasing cognitive inhibition with a difficult prior task

T2 - ZDM Mathematics Education

AU - Attridge,Nina

AU - Inglis,Matthew

PY - 2015/9

Y1 - 2015/9

N2 - Dual-process theories posit two distinct types of cognitive processing: Type 1, which does not use working memory making it fast and automatic, and Type 2, which does use working memory making it slow and effortful. Mathematics often relies on the inhibition of pervasive Type 1 processing to apply new skills or knowledge that require Type 2 processing. In two studies, we demonstrate that giving participants a difficult task (Raven’s Matrices) before a task that requires the inhibition of intuitive responses (the Cognitive Reflection Test) significantly improves performance. Our findings suggest that encountering a difficult task that requires Type 2 processing before completing a task that requires inhibition of Type 1 processing may encourage an enduring ‘Type 2’ mindset, whereby participants are more likely to spontaneously use Type 2 processing for a period of time. Implications for mathematics education are discussed.

AB - Dual-process theories posit two distinct types of cognitive processing: Type 1, which does not use working memory making it fast and automatic, and Type 2, which does use working memory making it slow and effortful. Mathematics often relies on the inhibition of pervasive Type 1 processing to apply new skills or knowledge that require Type 2 processing. In two studies, we demonstrate that giving participants a difficult task (Raven’s Matrices) before a task that requires the inhibition of intuitive responses (the Cognitive Reflection Test) significantly improves performance. Our findings suggest that encountering a difficult task that requires Type 2 processing before completing a task that requires inhibition of Type 1 processing may encourage an enduring ‘Type 2’ mindset, whereby participants are more likely to spontaneously use Type 2 processing for a period of time. Implications for mathematics education are discussed.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0656-1

U2 - 10.1007/s11858-014-0656-1

DO - 10.1007/s11858-014-0656-1

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 723

EP - 734

JO - ZDM Mathematics Education

JF - ZDM Mathematics Education

SN - 1863-9690

IS - 5

ER -