TY - JOUR
T1 - In vitro optimization of Dexamethasone Phosphate delivery by iontophoresis
AU - Sylvestre, J -P
AU - Guy, R H
AU - Delgado-Charro, M B
N1 - Fulltext of article freely available from PubMed Central via the weblink shown above.
PY - 2008/10
Y1 - 2008/10
N2 - Background and Purpose.
This study was designed to evaluate the effects of
competing ions and electroosmosis on the transdermal iontophoresis of dexamethasone
phosphate (Dex-Phos) and to identify the optimal conditions for its delivery.
Methods.
The experiments were performed using pig skin, in side-by-side diffusion
cells (0.78 cm2), passing a constant current of 0.3 mA via Ag-AgCl electrodes.
Dex-Phos transport was quantified for donor solutions (anodal and cathodal) containing
different drug concentrations, with and without background electrolyte.
Electrotransport of co-ion, citrate, and counterions Na and K also was quantified.
The contribution of electroosmosis was evaluated by measuring the transport of the
neutral marker (mannitol).
Results.
Electromigration was the dominant mechanism of drug iontophoresis,
and reduction in electroosmotic flow directed against the cathodic delivery of
Dex-Phos did not improve drug delivery. The Dex-Phos flux from the cathode was
found to be optimal (transport number of 0.012) when background electrolyte was
excluded from the formulation. In this case, transport of the drug is limited principally
by the competition with counterions (mainly Na with a transport number of
0.8) and the mobility of the drug in the membrane.
Discussion and Conclusion. Dex-Phos must be delivered from the cathode
and formulated rationally, excluding mobile co-anions, to achieve optimal iontophoretic
delivery.
AB - Background and Purpose.
This study was designed to evaluate the effects of
competing ions and electroosmosis on the transdermal iontophoresis of dexamethasone
phosphate (Dex-Phos) and to identify the optimal conditions for its delivery.
Methods.
The experiments were performed using pig skin, in side-by-side diffusion
cells (0.78 cm2), passing a constant current of 0.3 mA via Ag-AgCl electrodes.
Dex-Phos transport was quantified for donor solutions (anodal and cathodal) containing
different drug concentrations, with and without background electrolyte.
Electrotransport of co-ion, citrate, and counterions Na and K also was quantified.
The contribution of electroosmosis was evaluated by measuring the transport of the
neutral marker (mannitol).
Results.
Electromigration was the dominant mechanism of drug iontophoresis,
and reduction in electroosmotic flow directed against the cathodic delivery of
Dex-Phos did not improve drug delivery. The Dex-Phos flux from the cathode was
found to be optimal (transport number of 0.012) when background electrolyte was
excluded from the formulation. In this case, transport of the drug is limited principally
by the competition with counterions (mainly Na with a transport number of
0.8) and the mobility of the drug in the membrane.
Discussion and Conclusion. Dex-Phos must be delivered from the cathode
and formulated rationally, excluding mobile co-anions, to achieve optimal iontophoretic
delivery.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=52049105725&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC2557054
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20080043
U2 - 10.2522/ptj.20080043
DO - 10.2522/ptj.20080043
M3 - Article
SN - 0031-9023
VL - 88
SP - 1177
EP - 1185
JO - Physical Therapy
JF - Physical Therapy
IS - 10
ER -