In support of null hypothesis significance testing

M Mogie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Citations (SciVal)


Many criticisms have been levelled at null hypothesis significance testing (NHST). It is argued here that although there is reason to doubt that data subjected only to NHST have been subjected to sufficient analysis, the search for clear answers to well-formulated questions derived from substantive hypotheses is well served by NHST. To reliably draw inferences from data, however, NHST may need to be complemented by additional methods of analysis, such as the use of confidence intervals and of estimates of the degree of association between independent and dependent variables. It is argued that these should be seen as complements of, rather than as substitutes for, NHST since they do not directly test the strength of evidence against a null hypothesis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S82-S84
JournalProceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Publication statusPublished - 2004


Dive into the research topics of 'In support of null hypothesis significance testing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this