In support of null hypothesis significance testing

M Mogie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many criticisms have been levelled at null hypothesis significance testing (NHST). It is argued here that although there is reason to doubt that data subjected only to NHST have been subjected to sufficient analysis, the search for clear answers to well-formulated questions derived from substantive hypotheses is well served by NHST. To reliably draw inferences from data, however, NHST may need to be complemented by additional methods of analysis, such as the use of confidence intervals and of estimates of the degree of association between independent and dependent variables. It is argued that these should be seen as complements of, rather than as substitutes for, NHST since they do not directly test the strength of evidence against a null hypothesis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S82-S84
JournalProceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Volume271
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Fingerprint

hypothesis testing
Confidence Intervals
Testing
testing
confidence interval
complement
analysis

Cite this

In support of null hypothesis significance testing. / Mogie, M.

In: Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 271, 2004, p. S82-S84.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{be93d3455fc84d3c85316a98be339376,
title = "In support of null hypothesis significance testing",
abstract = "Many criticisms have been levelled at null hypothesis significance testing (NHST). It is argued here that although there is reason to doubt that data subjected only to NHST have been subjected to sufficient analysis, the search for clear answers to well-formulated questions derived from substantive hypotheses is well served by NHST. To reliably draw inferences from data, however, NHST may need to be complemented by additional methods of analysis, such as the use of confidence intervals and of estimates of the degree of association between independent and dependent variables. It is argued that these should be seen as complements of, rather than as substitutes for, NHST since they do not directly test the strength of evidence against a null hypothesis.",
author = "M Mogie",
note = "ID number: ISI:000188786700025",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1098/rsbl.2003.0105",
language = "English",
volume = "271",
pages = "S82--S84",
journal = "Philosophical transactions B: Biological Sciences",
issn = "0962-8436",
publisher = "The Royal Society",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - In support of null hypothesis significance testing

AU - Mogie, M

N1 - ID number: ISI:000188786700025

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Many criticisms have been levelled at null hypothesis significance testing (NHST). It is argued here that although there is reason to doubt that data subjected only to NHST have been subjected to sufficient analysis, the search for clear answers to well-formulated questions derived from substantive hypotheses is well served by NHST. To reliably draw inferences from data, however, NHST may need to be complemented by additional methods of analysis, such as the use of confidence intervals and of estimates of the degree of association between independent and dependent variables. It is argued that these should be seen as complements of, rather than as substitutes for, NHST since they do not directly test the strength of evidence against a null hypothesis.

AB - Many criticisms have been levelled at null hypothesis significance testing (NHST). It is argued here that although there is reason to doubt that data subjected only to NHST have been subjected to sufficient analysis, the search for clear answers to well-formulated questions derived from substantive hypotheses is well served by NHST. To reliably draw inferences from data, however, NHST may need to be complemented by additional methods of analysis, such as the use of confidence intervals and of estimates of the degree of association between independent and dependent variables. It is argued that these should be seen as complements of, rather than as substitutes for, NHST since they do not directly test the strength of evidence against a null hypothesis.

U2 - 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0105

DO - 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0105

M3 - Article

VL - 271

SP - S82-S84

JO - Philosophical transactions B: Biological Sciences

JF - Philosophical transactions B: Biological Sciences

SN - 0962-8436

ER -