In good company: The influence of peers on industry engagement by academic scientists

V. Tartan, M. Perkmann, A. Salter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

115 Citations (SciVal)
41 Downloads (Pure)


Previous research on academic entrepreneurship and engagement with industry has found that the behaviour of academics is influenced by their local social context. However, we know little about the mechanisms that produce this effect. We argue that academic scientists' industry engagement is influenced significantly by the behaviour of their peers, that is, the behaviour of colleagues of similar seniority. Using insights from social psychology, we hypothesize that these peer effects are produced by the mechanism of social comparison. In an analysis of data from multiple sources for 1370 UK academic scientists and engineers, we find that peer effects are stronger for early career individuals and weaker for star scientists, suggesting the incidence of social comparison. We argue that individuals look to their immediate peers for inspiration, because they view them as an important reference group and use them as a benchmark for their own ambitions and behaviours. Our findings have important implications for how universities may encourage scientists' behaviours by paying attention to local work contexts.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1189-1203
Number of pages15
JournalResearch Policy
Issue number7
Early online date3 Apr 2014
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2014


  • University–industry relations
  • Academic engagement
  • Commericalization
  • Scientists
  • Peer effects


Dive into the research topics of 'In good company: The influence of peers on industry engagement by academic scientists'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this