Improved EEG source localization with Bayesian uncertainty modelling of unknown skull conductivity

Ville Rimpiläinen, Alexandra Koulouri, Felix Lucka, Jari P. Kaipio, Carsten H. Wolters

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Electroencephalography (EEG) source imaging is an ill-posed inverse problem that requires accurate conductivity modelling of the head tissues, especially the skull. Unfortunately, the conductivity values are difficult to determine in vivo. In this paper, we show that the exact knowledge of the skull conductivity is not always necessary when the Bayesian approximation error (BAE) approach is exploited. In BAE, we first postulate a probability distribution for the skull conductivity that describes our (lack of) knowledge on its value, and model the effects of this uncertainty on EEG recordings with the help of an additive error term in the observation model. Before the Bayesian inference, the likelihood is marginalized over this error term. Thus, in the inversion we estimate only our primary unknown, the source distribution. We quantified the improvements in the source localization when the proposed Bayesian modelling was used in the presence of different skull conductivity errors and levels of measurement noise. Based on the results, BAE was able to improve the source localization accuracy, particularly when the unknown (true) skull conductivity was much lower than the expected standard conductivity value. The source locations that gained the highest improvements were shallow and originally exhibited the largest localization errors. In our case study, the benefits of BAE became negligible when the signal-to-noise ratio dropped to 20 dB.

LanguageEnglish
Pages252-260
Number of pages9
JournalNeuroImage
Volume188
Early online date6 Dec 2018
DOIs
StatusPublished - 1 Mar 2019

Keywords

  • Bayesian inverse problem
  • Electroencephalography
  • Skull conductivity
  • Source localization
  • Uncertainty modelling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Improved EEG source localization with Bayesian uncertainty modelling of unknown skull conductivity. / Rimpiläinen, Ville; Koulouri, Alexandra; Lucka, Felix; Kaipio, Jari P.; Wolters, Carsten H.

In: NeuroImage, Vol. 188, 01.03.2019, p. 252-260.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rimpiläinen, Ville ; Koulouri, Alexandra ; Lucka, Felix ; Kaipio, Jari P. ; Wolters, Carsten H. / Improved EEG source localization with Bayesian uncertainty modelling of unknown skull conductivity. In: NeuroImage. 2019 ; Vol. 188. pp. 252-260.
@article{ba5313f6bcf7437cb0af749cb1f1fede,
title = "Improved EEG source localization with Bayesian uncertainty modelling of unknown skull conductivity",
abstract = "Electroencephalography (EEG) source imaging is an ill-posed inverse problem that requires accurate conductivity modelling of the head tissues, especially the skull. Unfortunately, the conductivity values are difficult to determine in vivo. In this paper, we show that the exact knowledge of the skull conductivity is not always necessary when the Bayesian approximation error (BAE) approach is exploited. In BAE, we first postulate a probability distribution for the skull conductivity that describes our (lack of) knowledge on its value, and model the effects of this uncertainty on EEG recordings with the help of an additive error term in the observation model. Before the Bayesian inference, the likelihood is marginalized over this error term. Thus, in the inversion we estimate only our primary unknown, the source distribution. We quantified the improvements in the source localization when the proposed Bayesian modelling was used in the presence of different skull conductivity errors and levels of measurement noise. Based on the results, BAE was able to improve the source localization accuracy, particularly when the unknown (true) skull conductivity was much lower than the expected standard conductivity value. The source locations that gained the highest improvements were shallow and originally exhibited the largest localization errors. In our case study, the benefits of BAE became negligible when the signal-to-noise ratio dropped to 20 dB.",
keywords = "Bayesian inverse problem, Electroencephalography, Skull conductivity, Source localization, Uncertainty modelling",
author = "Ville Rimpil{\"a}inen and Alexandra Koulouri and Felix Lucka and Kaipio, {Jari P.} and Wolters, {Carsten H.}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.11.058",
language = "English",
volume = "188",
pages = "252--260",
journal = "NeuroImage",
issn = "1053-8119",
publisher = "Elsevier Academic Press Inc",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improved EEG source localization with Bayesian uncertainty modelling of unknown skull conductivity

AU - Rimpiläinen, Ville

AU - Koulouri, Alexandra

AU - Lucka, Felix

AU - Kaipio, Jari P.

AU - Wolters, Carsten H.

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - Electroencephalography (EEG) source imaging is an ill-posed inverse problem that requires accurate conductivity modelling of the head tissues, especially the skull. Unfortunately, the conductivity values are difficult to determine in vivo. In this paper, we show that the exact knowledge of the skull conductivity is not always necessary when the Bayesian approximation error (BAE) approach is exploited. In BAE, we first postulate a probability distribution for the skull conductivity that describes our (lack of) knowledge on its value, and model the effects of this uncertainty on EEG recordings with the help of an additive error term in the observation model. Before the Bayesian inference, the likelihood is marginalized over this error term. Thus, in the inversion we estimate only our primary unknown, the source distribution. We quantified the improvements in the source localization when the proposed Bayesian modelling was used in the presence of different skull conductivity errors and levels of measurement noise. Based on the results, BAE was able to improve the source localization accuracy, particularly when the unknown (true) skull conductivity was much lower than the expected standard conductivity value. The source locations that gained the highest improvements were shallow and originally exhibited the largest localization errors. In our case study, the benefits of BAE became negligible when the signal-to-noise ratio dropped to 20 dB.

AB - Electroencephalography (EEG) source imaging is an ill-posed inverse problem that requires accurate conductivity modelling of the head tissues, especially the skull. Unfortunately, the conductivity values are difficult to determine in vivo. In this paper, we show that the exact knowledge of the skull conductivity is not always necessary when the Bayesian approximation error (BAE) approach is exploited. In BAE, we first postulate a probability distribution for the skull conductivity that describes our (lack of) knowledge on its value, and model the effects of this uncertainty on EEG recordings with the help of an additive error term in the observation model. Before the Bayesian inference, the likelihood is marginalized over this error term. Thus, in the inversion we estimate only our primary unknown, the source distribution. We quantified the improvements in the source localization when the proposed Bayesian modelling was used in the presence of different skull conductivity errors and levels of measurement noise. Based on the results, BAE was able to improve the source localization accuracy, particularly when the unknown (true) skull conductivity was much lower than the expected standard conductivity value. The source locations that gained the highest improvements were shallow and originally exhibited the largest localization errors. In our case study, the benefits of BAE became negligible when the signal-to-noise ratio dropped to 20 dB.

KW - Bayesian inverse problem

KW - Electroencephalography

KW - Skull conductivity

KW - Source localization

KW - Uncertainty modelling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058408352&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.11.058

DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.11.058

M3 - Article

VL - 188

SP - 252

EP - 260

JO - NeuroImage

T2 - NeuroImage

JF - NeuroImage

SN - 1053-8119

ER -