Abstract
This article explores questions of im/probability of/as post/authorship in postfoundational inquiry. Inspired by Deleuzian philosophy, the article instantiates post/authorship and academic writing otherwise as a means to interrogate, critique, and undo the representationalist modes of normative authorship. Through a series of playful im/probabilities, the article suggests and enacts a writerly mode of post/authorship that reframes notions of authorial intentionality and origination. Reviewer 2: “… your contribution … needs to be more clearly stated at the outset”.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 914-921 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Qualitative Inquiry |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 8-9 |
| Early online date | 2 Feb 2023 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2023 |
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Keywords
- academic-writing-machine
- authorship
- imposters
- inquiry without method
- post/authorship
- writerly invention
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Anthropology
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)