(Im)possibilities of autonomy: social movements in and beyond capital, the state and development

Steffen Bohm, Ana Cecilia Dinerstein, Andre Spicer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

76 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper we interrogate the demand and practice of autonomy in social movements. We begin by identifying three main conceptions of autonomy: (1) autonomous practices vis-agrave-vis capital; (2) self-determination and independence from the state; and (3) alternatives to hegemonic discourses of development. We then point to limits associated with autonomy and discuss how demands for autonomy are tied up with contemporary re-organizations of: (1) the capitalist workplace, characterized by discourses of autonomy, creativity and self-management; (2) the state, which increasingly outsources public services to independent, autonomous providers, which often have a more radical, social movement history; and (3) regimes of development, which today often emphasize local practices, participation and self-determination. This capturing of autonomy reminds us that autonomy can never be fixed. Instead, social movements' demands for autonomy are embedded in specific social, economic, political and cultural contexts, giving rise to possibilities as well as impossibilities of autonomous practices.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)17-32
Number of pages16
JournalSocial Movement Studies
Volume9
Issue number1
Early online date13 Jan 2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2010

Keywords

  • autonomy, anti-capitalism, theory, impossibility, social movements

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of '(Im)possibilities of autonomy: social movements in and beyond capital, the state and development'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Projects

    Cite this