Impacts on work performance; what matters 6 months on?

G Wynne-Jones, Rhiannon Buck, A Varnava, C J Phillips, C J Main

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (SciVal)


Aims: To establish whether self-reported health, perceptions of work and objective characteristics of work measured at baseline can predict performance at 6 months follow-up.

Methods: Self-completed questionnaires to assess health, objective characteristics of work and perceptions of work were completed at two public sector organizations. Follow-up questionnaires were completed at 6 months to assess workplace performance using a visual analogue scale for self-rated performance and the Stanford Presenteeism Scale 6 (SPS6).

Results: Five hundred and five employees completed questionnaires at baseline and 310 (61%) of these completed follow-up questionnaires. Psychological distress as measured with the General Health Questionnaire and perceptions of work predicted both self-rated performance and SPS6 score. Objective characteristics of work were relatively unimportant in the prediction of future performance.

Conclusions: This study has provided an initial indication of the factors that may predict performance at follow-up in the population studied. These findings may be used to generate hypotheses for future studies and highlights the need to assess a range of factors in relation to an individual's performance at work including health and perceptions of work.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)205-208
Number of pages4
JournalOccupational Medicine
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - May 2011


  • occupational epidemiology
  • work performance
  • workplace
  • employee health


Dive into the research topics of 'Impacts on work performance; what matters 6 months on?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this