Abstract
Objective
To systematically review available data on the effects of heated tobacco products (HTPs) on biomarkers of potential harm (BoPH) and adverse events, including comparison to cigarettes, e-cigarettes and smoking abstinence.
Data sources
Web of Science, Scopus, MedRxiv, ClinicalTrials.gov, ICTRP database and HTP manufacturer libraries were searched from January 2010 to December 2024.
Study selection
Included studies were interventional clinical trials of any design that measured BoPH or adverse events in adults assigned a marketed HTP and another assigned either cigarettes, e-cigarettes or smoking abstinence.
Data extraction
Two reviewers independently extracted data into a predesigned form and assessed risk of bias using Cochrane’s Risk of Bias tool version 1.
Data synthesis
BoPH data were synthesised using effect direction plots. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled risk ratios for adverse event data. 40 studies (10 independent, 29 industry-affiliated and 1 of unclear affiliation) were included. Only nine studies lasted longer than 5 days. 19 involved using the intervention just once. Risk of bias was high for 32 studies and unclear for 8. Data on 143 BoPH indicated short-term HTP use had mixed effects compared with cigarettes, e-cigarettes and smoking abstinence. The rate of adverse event reporting was not significantly different between HTP and any comparator group.
Conclusions
Despite a growing evidence base, significant limitations hinder interpretation of the data, which do not yet provide clear indication of harm or benefit, even compared with cigarettes. Longer, better quality studies independent of tobacco industry funding are needed to determine the health impacts of HTPs.
To systematically review available data on the effects of heated tobacco products (HTPs) on biomarkers of potential harm (BoPH) and adverse events, including comparison to cigarettes, e-cigarettes and smoking abstinence.
Data sources
Web of Science, Scopus, MedRxiv, ClinicalTrials.gov, ICTRP database and HTP manufacturer libraries were searched from January 2010 to December 2024.
Study selection
Included studies were interventional clinical trials of any design that measured BoPH or adverse events in adults assigned a marketed HTP and another assigned either cigarettes, e-cigarettes or smoking abstinence.
Data extraction
Two reviewers independently extracted data into a predesigned form and assessed risk of bias using Cochrane’s Risk of Bias tool version 1.
Data synthesis
BoPH data were synthesised using effect direction plots. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled risk ratios for adverse event data. 40 studies (10 independent, 29 industry-affiliated and 1 of unclear affiliation) were included. Only nine studies lasted longer than 5 days. 19 involved using the intervention just once. Risk of bias was high for 32 studies and unclear for 8. Data on 143 BoPH indicated short-term HTP use had mixed effects compared with cigarettes, e-cigarettes and smoking abstinence. The rate of adverse event reporting was not significantly different between HTP and any comparator group.
Conclusions
Despite a growing evidence base, significant limitations hinder interpretation of the data, which do not yet provide clear indication of harm or benefit, even compared with cigarettes. Longer, better quality studies independent of tobacco industry funding are needed to determine the health impacts of HTPs.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e059000 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-13 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Tobacco Control |
| Early online date | 29 Apr 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 29 Apr 2025 |
Data Availability Statement
All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Amber van den Akker, Gemma Taylor and Chris Metcalfe 432 for their work in our previous review that contributed to this review.Funding
This study was funded by Bloomberg Philanthropies as part of the Bloomberg Initiative to Reduce Tobacco use (www.bloomberg.org).
Keywords
- Harm Reduction
- Non-cigarette tobacco products
- Tobacco industry
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Health(social science)
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
