Image-model coupling

application to an ionospheric storm

N. D. Smith, D. Pokhotelov, C. N. Mitchell, C. Budd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Techniques such as tomographic reconstruction may be used to provide images of electron content in the ionosphere. Models are also available which attempt to describe the dominant physical processes operating in the ionosphere, or the statistical relationships between ionospheric variables. It is sensible to try and couple model output to tomographic images with the aim of inferring the values of driver variables which best replicate some description of electron content imaged in the ionosphere, according to some criterion. This is a challenging task. The following describes an attempt to couple an ionospheric model to a tomographic reconstruction of the geomagnetic storm of 20 November 2003, along a latitudal line segment above north America. A simple model was chosen to reduce the number of input drivers that were varied. The investigation illustrates some of the issues involved in image-model coupling. The ability to make scientific deductions depends on the accuracy of the assumptions in the ionospheric model and the accuracy of the tomographic reconstruction. An ensemble technique was used to help assess confidence in the reconstruction.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)361-369
JournalNonlinear Processes in Geophysics
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Aug 2010

Fingerprint

ionospheric storms
Ionosphere
ionospherics
ionospheres
ionosphere
electron
Electrons
deduction
geomagnetic storm
magnetic storms
confidence
electrons
output

Cite this

Image-model coupling : application to an ionospheric storm. / Smith, N. D.; Pokhotelov, D.; Mitchell, C. N.; Budd, C.

In: Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, Vol. 17, No. 4, 20.08.2010, p. 361-369.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4b3ab57c198442839ec23828be06919c,
title = "Image-model coupling: application to an ionospheric storm",
abstract = "Techniques such as tomographic reconstruction may be used to provide images of electron content in the ionosphere. Models are also available which attempt to describe the dominant physical processes operating in the ionosphere, or the statistical relationships between ionospheric variables. It is sensible to try and couple model output to tomographic images with the aim of inferring the values of driver variables which best replicate some description of electron content imaged in the ionosphere, according to some criterion. This is a challenging task. The following describes an attempt to couple an ionospheric model to a tomographic reconstruction of the geomagnetic storm of 20 November 2003, along a latitudal line segment above north America. A simple model was chosen to reduce the number of input drivers that were varied. The investigation illustrates some of the issues involved in image-model coupling. The ability to make scientific deductions depends on the accuracy of the assumptions in the ionospheric model and the accuracy of the tomographic reconstruction. An ensemble technique was used to help assess confidence in the reconstruction.",
author = "Smith, {N. D.} and D. Pokhotelov and Mitchell, {C. N.} and C. Budd",
year = "2010",
month = "8",
day = "20",
doi = "10.5194/npg-17-361-2010",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "361--369",
journal = "Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics",
issn = "1023-5809",
publisher = "European Geosciences Union",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Image-model coupling

T2 - application to an ionospheric storm

AU - Smith, N. D.

AU - Pokhotelov, D.

AU - Mitchell, C. N.

AU - Budd, C.

PY - 2010/8/20

Y1 - 2010/8/20

N2 - Techniques such as tomographic reconstruction may be used to provide images of electron content in the ionosphere. Models are also available which attempt to describe the dominant physical processes operating in the ionosphere, or the statistical relationships between ionospheric variables. It is sensible to try and couple model output to tomographic images with the aim of inferring the values of driver variables which best replicate some description of electron content imaged in the ionosphere, according to some criterion. This is a challenging task. The following describes an attempt to couple an ionospheric model to a tomographic reconstruction of the geomagnetic storm of 20 November 2003, along a latitudal line segment above north America. A simple model was chosen to reduce the number of input drivers that were varied. The investigation illustrates some of the issues involved in image-model coupling. The ability to make scientific deductions depends on the accuracy of the assumptions in the ionospheric model and the accuracy of the tomographic reconstruction. An ensemble technique was used to help assess confidence in the reconstruction.

AB - Techniques such as tomographic reconstruction may be used to provide images of electron content in the ionosphere. Models are also available which attempt to describe the dominant physical processes operating in the ionosphere, or the statistical relationships between ionospheric variables. It is sensible to try and couple model output to tomographic images with the aim of inferring the values of driver variables which best replicate some description of electron content imaged in the ionosphere, according to some criterion. This is a challenging task. The following describes an attempt to couple an ionospheric model to a tomographic reconstruction of the geomagnetic storm of 20 November 2003, along a latitudal line segment above north America. A simple model was chosen to reduce the number of input drivers that were varied. The investigation illustrates some of the issues involved in image-model coupling. The ability to make scientific deductions depends on the accuracy of the assumptions in the ionospheric model and the accuracy of the tomographic reconstruction. An ensemble technique was used to help assess confidence in the reconstruction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955961636&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/npg-17-361-2010

U2 - 10.5194/npg-17-361-2010

DO - 10.5194/npg-17-361-2010

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 361

EP - 369

JO - Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics

JF - Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics

SN - 1023-5809

IS - 4

ER -