Illness action rediscovered: a case study of upper limb pain (Retracted article. see vol 29, pg 955, 2007)

M Calnan, D Wainwright, C O'Neill, A Winterbottom, C Watkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Theoretical frameworks provide generalised accounts of illness action although empirical studies of the process are still in short supply. This study of upper limb pain provided a case study of illness action; as it is a common condition, there is uncertainty about its treatment and management, orthodox and non-orthodox care are seen as legitimate sources of help and it is linked with a range of causes. Face-to-face informal interviews were carried out with 47 informants with upper limb pain and their practitioners (n=19). The data were analysed in two different ways. The general stages of the illness action process were identified through a descriptive analysis of the upper limb pain sufferers' accounts and the policies and practices reported by their practitioners. Then, case studies were constructed to depict individual pathways through healthcare and consequences for sufferers. The illness action process was characterised by the normalisation and accommodation of pain informed by a discourse that predominantly invoked ageing and the wear and tear of the body. Practitioners also preferred to adopt a biomechanical approach and were reluctant to attribute psychosocial labels. The case studies illustrated the divergent, negotiated and opportunistic nature of the process and showed that the use of both orthodox and non-orthodox care formed only part of strategies used to manage upper limb pain. Sufferers evaluated the care they received in terms of pain alleviation, and were resigned to searching for the best way of living with their pain.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)321-346
Number of pages26
JournalSociology of Health and Illness
Volume29
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

Upper Extremity
pain
illness
Pain
wear and tear
normalization
Tears
accommodation
Uncertainty
uncertainty
Interviews
supply
Delivery of Health Care
cause
discourse
interview
management

Cite this

Illness action rediscovered: a case study of upper limb pain (Retracted article. see vol 29, pg 955, 2007). / Calnan, M; Wainwright, D; O'Neill, C; Winterbottom, A; Watkins, C.

In: Sociology of Health and Illness, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2007, p. 321-346.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{395444b969d34cfeb7c6ea0c6cb19933,
title = "Illness action rediscovered: a case study of upper limb pain (Retracted article. see vol 29, pg 955, 2007)",
abstract = "Theoretical frameworks provide generalised accounts of illness action although empirical studies of the process are still in short supply. This study of upper limb pain provided a case study of illness action; as it is a common condition, there is uncertainty about its treatment and management, orthodox and non-orthodox care are seen as legitimate sources of help and it is linked with a range of causes. Face-to-face informal interviews were carried out with 47 informants with upper limb pain and their practitioners (n=19). The data were analysed in two different ways. The general stages of the illness action process were identified through a descriptive analysis of the upper limb pain sufferers' accounts and the policies and practices reported by their practitioners. Then, case studies were constructed to depict individual pathways through healthcare and consequences for sufferers. The illness action process was characterised by the normalisation and accommodation of pain informed by a discourse that predominantly invoked ageing and the wear and tear of the body. Practitioners also preferred to adopt a biomechanical approach and were reluctant to attribute psychosocial labels. The case studies illustrated the divergent, negotiated and opportunistic nature of the process and showed that the use of both orthodox and non-orthodox care formed only part of strategies used to manage upper limb pain. Sufferers evaluated the care they received in terms of pain alleviation, and were resigned to searching for the best way of living with their pain.",
author = "M Calnan and D Wainwright and C O'Neill and A Winterbottom and C Watkins",
note = "ID number: ISI:000246040400001",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.00543.x",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "321--346",
journal = "Sociology of Health and Illness",
issn = "0141-9889",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Illness action rediscovered: a case study of upper limb pain (Retracted article. see vol 29, pg 955, 2007)

AU - Calnan, M

AU - Wainwright, D

AU - O'Neill, C

AU - Winterbottom, A

AU - Watkins, C

N1 - ID number: ISI:000246040400001

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Theoretical frameworks provide generalised accounts of illness action although empirical studies of the process are still in short supply. This study of upper limb pain provided a case study of illness action; as it is a common condition, there is uncertainty about its treatment and management, orthodox and non-orthodox care are seen as legitimate sources of help and it is linked with a range of causes. Face-to-face informal interviews were carried out with 47 informants with upper limb pain and their practitioners (n=19). The data were analysed in two different ways. The general stages of the illness action process were identified through a descriptive analysis of the upper limb pain sufferers' accounts and the policies and practices reported by their practitioners. Then, case studies were constructed to depict individual pathways through healthcare and consequences for sufferers. The illness action process was characterised by the normalisation and accommodation of pain informed by a discourse that predominantly invoked ageing and the wear and tear of the body. Practitioners also preferred to adopt a biomechanical approach and were reluctant to attribute psychosocial labels. The case studies illustrated the divergent, negotiated and opportunistic nature of the process and showed that the use of both orthodox and non-orthodox care formed only part of strategies used to manage upper limb pain. Sufferers evaluated the care they received in terms of pain alleviation, and were resigned to searching for the best way of living with their pain.

AB - Theoretical frameworks provide generalised accounts of illness action although empirical studies of the process are still in short supply. This study of upper limb pain provided a case study of illness action; as it is a common condition, there is uncertainty about its treatment and management, orthodox and non-orthodox care are seen as legitimate sources of help and it is linked with a range of causes. Face-to-face informal interviews were carried out with 47 informants with upper limb pain and their practitioners (n=19). The data were analysed in two different ways. The general stages of the illness action process were identified through a descriptive analysis of the upper limb pain sufferers' accounts and the policies and practices reported by their practitioners. Then, case studies were constructed to depict individual pathways through healthcare and consequences for sufferers. The illness action process was characterised by the normalisation and accommodation of pain informed by a discourse that predominantly invoked ageing and the wear and tear of the body. Practitioners also preferred to adopt a biomechanical approach and were reluctant to attribute psychosocial labels. The case studies illustrated the divergent, negotiated and opportunistic nature of the process and showed that the use of both orthodox and non-orthodox care formed only part of strategies used to manage upper limb pain. Sufferers evaluated the care they received in terms of pain alleviation, and were resigned to searching for the best way of living with their pain.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.00543.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.00543.x

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 321

EP - 346

JO - Sociology of Health and Illness

JF - Sociology of Health and Illness

SN - 0141-9889

IS - 3

ER -