Identity Work, Loss and Preferred Identities: A study of UK business school deans

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper investigates how leaders construct ‘loss’ identity narratives which defuse the scope for external attack and sustain self-meanings. We draw on a sample of 31 UK business school deans, who although often depicted as multi-talented, high status achievers are also targets for criticism and have high rates of turnover. Our study makes two principal contributions. First, we argue that leaders may employ a specific pattern of identity work involving talk about loss to construct identities that bolster their leadership by presenting them as making sacrifices for their institutions. Losses are ubiquitous and malleable discursive resources that constitute both identity threats and opportunities for constructing preferred identities. Second, we deepen understanding of ‘preferred identities’, i.e. normative self-narratives that specify who people want to be, and to be seen to be, and which serve self-meaning and impression management functions. Preferred identities, though, do not necessarily serve people’s interests, and deans tied themselves to demanding requirements to fabricate themselves as research credible, scrupulously moral, hard-working professionals.
LanguageEnglish
JournalOrganization Studies
StatusAccepted/In press - 14 May 2019

Cite this

@article{bb8ad6f7fe5041588739b56bab97447c,
title = "Identity Work, Loss and Preferred Identities: A study of UK business school deans",
abstract = "This paper investigates how leaders construct ‘loss’ identity narratives which defuse the scope for external attack and sustain self-meanings. We draw on a sample of 31 UK business school deans, who although often depicted as multi-talented, high status achievers are also targets for criticism and have high rates of turnover. Our study makes two principal contributions. First, we argue that leaders may employ a specific pattern of identity work involving talk about loss to construct identities that bolster their leadership by presenting them as making sacrifices for their institutions. Losses are ubiquitous and malleable discursive resources that constitute both identity threats and opportunities for constructing preferred identities. Second, we deepen understanding of ‘preferred identities’, i.e. normative self-narratives that specify who people want to be, and to be seen to be, and which serve self-meaning and impression management functions. Preferred identities, though, do not necessarily serve people’s interests, and deans tied themselves to demanding requirements to fabricate themselves as research credible, scrupulously moral, hard-working professionals.",
author = "Brown, {Andrew D.} and Lewis, {Michael A.} and Nick Oliver",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "14",
language = "English",
journal = "Organization Studies",
issn = "0170-8406",
publisher = "Sage Publications",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identity Work, Loss and Preferred Identities: A study of UK business school deans

AU - Brown, Andrew D.

AU - Lewis, Michael A.

AU - Oliver, Nick

PY - 2019/5/14

Y1 - 2019/5/14

N2 - This paper investigates how leaders construct ‘loss’ identity narratives which defuse the scope for external attack and sustain self-meanings. We draw on a sample of 31 UK business school deans, who although often depicted as multi-talented, high status achievers are also targets for criticism and have high rates of turnover. Our study makes two principal contributions. First, we argue that leaders may employ a specific pattern of identity work involving talk about loss to construct identities that bolster their leadership by presenting them as making sacrifices for their institutions. Losses are ubiquitous and malleable discursive resources that constitute both identity threats and opportunities for constructing preferred identities. Second, we deepen understanding of ‘preferred identities’, i.e. normative self-narratives that specify who people want to be, and to be seen to be, and which serve self-meaning and impression management functions. Preferred identities, though, do not necessarily serve people’s interests, and deans tied themselves to demanding requirements to fabricate themselves as research credible, scrupulously moral, hard-working professionals.

AB - This paper investigates how leaders construct ‘loss’ identity narratives which defuse the scope for external attack and sustain self-meanings. We draw on a sample of 31 UK business school deans, who although often depicted as multi-talented, high status achievers are also targets for criticism and have high rates of turnover. Our study makes two principal contributions. First, we argue that leaders may employ a specific pattern of identity work involving talk about loss to construct identities that bolster their leadership by presenting them as making sacrifices for their institutions. Losses are ubiquitous and malleable discursive resources that constitute both identity threats and opportunities for constructing preferred identities. Second, we deepen understanding of ‘preferred identities’, i.e. normative self-narratives that specify who people want to be, and to be seen to be, and which serve self-meaning and impression management functions. Preferred identities, though, do not necessarily serve people’s interests, and deans tied themselves to demanding requirements to fabricate themselves as research credible, scrupulously moral, hard-working professionals.

M3 - Article

JO - Organization Studies

T2 - Organization Studies

JF - Organization Studies

SN - 0170-8406

ER -