Identity Work, Humour and Disciplinary Power

Guy Huber, Andrew D. Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 3 Citations

Abstract

How are people’s identities disciplined by their talk about humour? Based on an ethnographic study of a New York food co-operative, we show how members’ talk about appropriate and inappropriate uses of humour disciplined their identity work. The principal contribution we make is twofold. First, we show that in their talk about humour people engaged in three types of identity work: homogenizing, differentiating and personalizing. These were associated with five practices of talk which constructed Co-op members as strong organizational identifiers, respectful towards others, flexible rule followers, not ‘too’ serious or self-righteous, and as autonomous individuals. Second, we analyse how this identity work (re)produced norms regulating the use of humour to fabricate conformist selves. Control, we argue, is not simply a matter of managers or other elites seeking to tighten the iron cage through corporate colonization to manufacture consent; rather, all organizational members are complicit in defining discourses, subject positions and appropriate conduct through discursive processes that are distributed and self-regulatory.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1107-1126
JournalOrganization Studies
Volume38
Issue number8
Early online date29 Dec 2016
DOIs
StatusPublished - 1 Aug 2017

Fingerprint

Managers
Iron
Disciplinary power
Identity work

Keywords

  • Sustainability
  • control
  • co-operatives
  • disciplinary power
  • humour
  • identity regulation
  • identity work

Cite this

Identity Work, Humour and Disciplinary Power. / Huber, Guy; Brown, Andrew D.

In: Organization Studies, Vol. 38, No. 8, 01.08.2017, p. 1107-1126.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Huber, Guy ; Brown, Andrew D. / Identity Work, Humour and Disciplinary Power. In: Organization Studies. 2017 ; Vol. 38, No. 8. pp. 1107-1126.
@article{df1ac5490bb140b8a7fbe79efe076097,
title = "Identity Work, Humour and Disciplinary Power",
abstract = "How are people’s identities disciplined by their talk about humour? Based on an ethnographic study of a New York food co-operative, we show how members’ talk about appropriate and inappropriate uses of humour disciplined their identity work. The principal contribution we make is twofold. First, we show that in their talk about humour people engaged in three types of identity work: homogenizing, differentiating and personalizing. These were associated with five practices of talk which constructed Co-op members as strong organizational identifiers, respectful towards others, flexible rule followers, not ‘too’ serious or self-righteous, and as autonomous individuals. Second, we analyse how this identity work (re)produced norms regulating the use of humour to fabricate conformist selves. Control, we argue, is not simply a matter of managers or other elites seeking to tighten the iron cage through corporate colonization to manufacture consent; rather, all organizational members are complicit in defining discourses, subject positions and appropriate conduct through discursive processes that are distributed and self-regulatory.",
keywords = "Sustainability, control, co-operatives, disciplinary power, humour, identity regulation, identity work",
author = "Guy Huber and Brown, {Andrew D.}",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0170840616677632",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "1107--1126",
journal = "Organization Studies",
issn = "0170-8406",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identity Work, Humour and Disciplinary Power

AU - Huber, Guy

AU - Brown, Andrew D.

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - How are people’s identities disciplined by their talk about humour? Based on an ethnographic study of a New York food co-operative, we show how members’ talk about appropriate and inappropriate uses of humour disciplined their identity work. The principal contribution we make is twofold. First, we show that in their talk about humour people engaged in three types of identity work: homogenizing, differentiating and personalizing. These were associated with five practices of talk which constructed Co-op members as strong organizational identifiers, respectful towards others, flexible rule followers, not ‘too’ serious or self-righteous, and as autonomous individuals. Second, we analyse how this identity work (re)produced norms regulating the use of humour to fabricate conformist selves. Control, we argue, is not simply a matter of managers or other elites seeking to tighten the iron cage through corporate colonization to manufacture consent; rather, all organizational members are complicit in defining discourses, subject positions and appropriate conduct through discursive processes that are distributed and self-regulatory.

AB - How are people’s identities disciplined by their talk about humour? Based on an ethnographic study of a New York food co-operative, we show how members’ talk about appropriate and inappropriate uses of humour disciplined their identity work. The principal contribution we make is twofold. First, we show that in their talk about humour people engaged in three types of identity work: homogenizing, differentiating and personalizing. These were associated with five practices of talk which constructed Co-op members as strong organizational identifiers, respectful towards others, flexible rule followers, not ‘too’ serious or self-righteous, and as autonomous individuals. Second, we analyse how this identity work (re)produced norms regulating the use of humour to fabricate conformist selves. Control, we argue, is not simply a matter of managers or other elites seeking to tighten the iron cage through corporate colonization to manufacture consent; rather, all organizational members are complicit in defining discourses, subject positions and appropriate conduct through discursive processes that are distributed and self-regulatory.

KW - Sustainability

KW - control

KW - co-operatives

KW - disciplinary power

KW - humour

KW - identity regulation

KW - identity work

UR - https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616677632

U2 - 10.1177/0170840616677632

DO - 10.1177/0170840616677632

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 1107

EP - 1126

JO - Organization Studies

T2 - Organization Studies

JF - Organization Studies

SN - 0170-8406

IS - 8

ER -