Identifying mid-water targets using the higher frequencies emitted by seismic sources of opportunity

Nikhil Banda, Philippe Blondel

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

2 Citations (Scopus)
114 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Seismic sources are routinely employed by the oil and gas industry to identify hydrocarbon reserves beneath the seabed, and by researchers to image the sub-seabed for geophysics and to identify geo-hazards such as tsunami-generating areas. For mitigation purposes, it is paramount to identify animals in the water column, but they can be missed by surface observations (if they are diving or in bad weather) or by Passive Acoustic Monitoring (if they remain silent). For operational reasons, it is also important to know about any other sizeable objects below the water surface. Seismic sources emit high-amplitude broadband sounds, typically below 300 Hz, directed toward the seabed. They can also radiate energy up to 20 kHz into the water column, and it can be used as a “source of opportunity”. We use these higher frequencies (between 500 Hz to 20 kHz) to investigate their potential in identifying a variety of mid-water targets, with data from surveys conducted in challenging environments (two in shallow waters, 7–25 m deep, one in deep water, >1,500 m deep) with seismic sources up to 4,500 cubic inches in volume. The shallow-water surveys used a fixed source and freely drifting buoys, whereas the deep-water survey used a towed source with passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) vessel closely follow the seismic vessel to record data. The time spreads of individual shots recorded and the SNR at frequencies between 20 Hz – 20 kHz were compared between the surveys. Based on target strengths of potential targets at different ranges, and on benchmarked models of acoustic propagation, 2-D plots of measured vs. expected levels can be used to detect “hidden” targets of different sizes (from 0.5 to 20 m). The analyses suggest that, at 500 Hz, it is possible to confidently detect mid-water targets within the exclusion zone, and potentially going much further, to as deep as 2 km and as far as 2 km from the source. This has important implications for real-time mitigation and protection of marine mammals, which can be detected even if they are submerged and silent.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationIEEE Oceans'2016 Conference Proceedings
Place of PublicationMonterey, U. S. A.
PublisherIEEE
Pages1-7
Number of pages7
ISBN (Print)978-1-5090-1537-5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

seismic source
acoustics
water
Water
vessel
shallow water
mitigation
deep water
water column
hydrocarbon reserve
target strength
marine mammal
gas industry
diving
monitoring
vessels
Acoustics
oil industry
geophysics
tsunami

Keywords

  • acoustics
  • mitigation
  • marine life impacts
  • cetaceans
  • marine mammals
  • seismics
  • ambient noise

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics
  • Ocean Engineering
  • Pollution
  • Oceanography

Cite this

Identifying mid-water targets using the higher frequencies emitted by seismic sources of opportunity. / Banda, Nikhil; Blondel, Philippe.

IEEE Oceans'2016 Conference Proceedings. Monterey, U. S. A. : IEEE, 2016. p. 1-7.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Banda, Nikhil ; Blondel, Philippe. / Identifying mid-water targets using the higher frequencies emitted by seismic sources of opportunity. IEEE Oceans'2016 Conference Proceedings. Monterey, U. S. A. : IEEE, 2016. pp. 1-7
@inproceedings{c5482a280a164d6aa8706f37da9f4f8a,
title = "Identifying mid-water targets using the higher frequencies emitted by seismic sources of opportunity",
abstract = "Seismic sources are routinely employed by the oil and gas industry to identify hydrocarbon reserves beneath the seabed, and by researchers to image the sub-seabed for geophysics and to identify geo-hazards such as tsunami-generating areas. For mitigation purposes, it is paramount to identify animals in the water column, but they can be missed by surface observations (if they are diving or in bad weather) or by Passive Acoustic Monitoring (if they remain silent). For operational reasons, it is also important to know about any other sizeable objects below the water surface. Seismic sources emit high-amplitude broadband sounds, typically below 300 Hz, directed toward the seabed. They can also radiate energy up to 20 kHz into the water column, and it can be used as a “source of opportunity”. We use these higher frequencies (between 500 Hz to 20 kHz) to investigate their potential in identifying a variety of mid-water targets, with data from surveys conducted in challenging environments (two in shallow waters, 7–25 m deep, one in deep water, >1,500 m deep) with seismic sources up to 4,500 cubic inches in volume. The shallow-water surveys used a fixed source and freely drifting buoys, whereas the deep-water survey used a towed source with passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) vessel closely follow the seismic vessel to record data. The time spreads of individual shots recorded and the SNR at frequencies between 20 Hz – 20 kHz were compared between the surveys. Based on target strengths of potential targets at different ranges, and on benchmarked models of acoustic propagation, 2-D plots of measured vs. expected levels can be used to detect “hidden” targets of different sizes (from 0.5 to 20 m). The analyses suggest that, at 500 Hz, it is possible to confidently detect mid-water targets within the exclusion zone, and potentially going much further, to as deep as 2 km and as far as 2 km from the source. This has important implications for real-time mitigation and protection of marine mammals, which can be detected even if they are submerged and silent.",
keywords = "acoustics, mitigation, marine life impacts, cetaceans, marine mammals, seismics, ambient noise",
author = "Nikhil Banda and Philippe Blondel",
note = "The electronic file is the accepted version, not formatted to IEEE standards yet (the latter will be available only after the conference).",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1109/OCEANS.2016.7761172",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-5090-1537-5",
pages = "1--7",
booktitle = "IEEE Oceans'2016 Conference Proceedings",
publisher = "IEEE",
address = "USA United States",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Identifying mid-water targets using the higher frequencies emitted by seismic sources of opportunity

AU - Banda, Nikhil

AU - Blondel, Philippe

N1 - The electronic file is the accepted version, not formatted to IEEE standards yet (the latter will be available only after the conference).

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Seismic sources are routinely employed by the oil and gas industry to identify hydrocarbon reserves beneath the seabed, and by researchers to image the sub-seabed for geophysics and to identify geo-hazards such as tsunami-generating areas. For mitigation purposes, it is paramount to identify animals in the water column, but they can be missed by surface observations (if they are diving or in bad weather) or by Passive Acoustic Monitoring (if they remain silent). For operational reasons, it is also important to know about any other sizeable objects below the water surface. Seismic sources emit high-amplitude broadband sounds, typically below 300 Hz, directed toward the seabed. They can also radiate energy up to 20 kHz into the water column, and it can be used as a “source of opportunity”. We use these higher frequencies (between 500 Hz to 20 kHz) to investigate their potential in identifying a variety of mid-water targets, with data from surveys conducted in challenging environments (two in shallow waters, 7–25 m deep, one in deep water, >1,500 m deep) with seismic sources up to 4,500 cubic inches in volume. The shallow-water surveys used a fixed source and freely drifting buoys, whereas the deep-water survey used a towed source with passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) vessel closely follow the seismic vessel to record data. The time spreads of individual shots recorded and the SNR at frequencies between 20 Hz – 20 kHz were compared between the surveys. Based on target strengths of potential targets at different ranges, and on benchmarked models of acoustic propagation, 2-D plots of measured vs. expected levels can be used to detect “hidden” targets of different sizes (from 0.5 to 20 m). The analyses suggest that, at 500 Hz, it is possible to confidently detect mid-water targets within the exclusion zone, and potentially going much further, to as deep as 2 km and as far as 2 km from the source. This has important implications for real-time mitigation and protection of marine mammals, which can be detected even if they are submerged and silent.

AB - Seismic sources are routinely employed by the oil and gas industry to identify hydrocarbon reserves beneath the seabed, and by researchers to image the sub-seabed for geophysics and to identify geo-hazards such as tsunami-generating areas. For mitigation purposes, it is paramount to identify animals in the water column, but they can be missed by surface observations (if they are diving or in bad weather) or by Passive Acoustic Monitoring (if they remain silent). For operational reasons, it is also important to know about any other sizeable objects below the water surface. Seismic sources emit high-amplitude broadband sounds, typically below 300 Hz, directed toward the seabed. They can also radiate energy up to 20 kHz into the water column, and it can be used as a “source of opportunity”. We use these higher frequencies (between 500 Hz to 20 kHz) to investigate their potential in identifying a variety of mid-water targets, with data from surveys conducted in challenging environments (two in shallow waters, 7–25 m deep, one in deep water, >1,500 m deep) with seismic sources up to 4,500 cubic inches in volume. The shallow-water surveys used a fixed source and freely drifting buoys, whereas the deep-water survey used a towed source with passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) vessel closely follow the seismic vessel to record data. The time spreads of individual shots recorded and the SNR at frequencies between 20 Hz – 20 kHz were compared between the surveys. Based on target strengths of potential targets at different ranges, and on benchmarked models of acoustic propagation, 2-D plots of measured vs. expected levels can be used to detect “hidden” targets of different sizes (from 0.5 to 20 m). The analyses suggest that, at 500 Hz, it is possible to confidently detect mid-water targets within the exclusion zone, and potentially going much further, to as deep as 2 km and as far as 2 km from the source. This has important implications for real-time mitigation and protection of marine mammals, which can be detected even if they are submerged and silent.

KW - acoustics

KW - mitigation

KW - marine life impacts

KW - cetaceans

KW - marine mammals

KW - seismics

KW - ambient noise

UR - https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS.2016.7761172

U2 - 10.1109/OCEANS.2016.7761172

DO - 10.1109/OCEANS.2016.7761172

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 978-1-5090-1537-5

SP - 1

EP - 7

BT - IEEE Oceans'2016 Conference Proceedings

PB - IEEE

CY - Monterey, U. S. A.

ER -