Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Identification and support of autistic individuals within the UK Criminal Justice System: A practical approach based upon professional consensus with input from lived experience

  • Emma Woodhouse
  • , Jack Hollingdale
  • , Lisa Davies
  • , Zainab Al-Attar
  • , Susan Young
  • , Luke P. Vinter
  • , Kwaku Agyemang
  • , Carla Bartlett
  • , Colleen Berryessa
  • , Eddie Chaplin
  • , Quinton Deeley
  • , Ian Freckelton
  • , Felicity Gerry
  • , Gisli Gudjonsson
  • , Katie Maras
  • , Michelle Mattison
  • , Jane McCarthy
  • , Richard Mills
  • , Peter Misch
  • , David Murphy
  • Clare Allely
  • King’s College London
  • University of Oxford
  • Reykjavik University
  • University of Derby
  • Barnet, Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust
  • Rutgers University-Camden
  • London South Bank University
  • King's College London
  • University of Melbourne
  • University of Chester
  • West London Mental Health NHS Trust
  • University of Salford
  • Compass Psychology Services Ltd
  • Expert Psychological Services
  • Psychology Services Limited
  • University College London
  • Victoria University
  • University of Central Lancashire
  • Tully Forensic Psychology Ltd, Nottingham
  • South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
  • Castan Chambers, Melbourne
  • Libertas Chambers, London
  • Crockett Chambers, Melbourne
  • University of Auckland
  • AT-Autism, London
  • Royal College of Psychiatrists

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17   Link opens in a new tab Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

Background: Autism spectrum disorder (hereafter referred to as autism) is characterised by difficulties with (i) social communication, social interaction, and (ii) restricted and repetitive interests and behaviours. Estimates of autism prevalence within the criminal justice system (CJS) vary considerably, but there is evidence to suggest that the condition can be missed or misidentified within this population. Autism has implications for an individual’s journey through the CJS, from police questioning and engagement in court proceedings through to risk assessment, formulation, therapeutic approaches, engagement with support services, and long-term social and legal outcomes.

Methods: This consensus based on professional opinion with input from lived experience aims to provide general principles for consideration by United Kingdom (UK) CJS personnel when working with autistic individuals, focusing on autistic offenders and those suspected of offences. Principles may be transferable to countries beyond the UK. Multidisciplinary professionals and two service users were approached for their input to address the effective identification and support strategies for autistic individuals within the CJS.

Results: The authors provide a consensus statement including recommendations on the general principles of effective identification, and support strategies for autistic individuals across different levels of the CJS.

Conclusion: Greater attention needs to be given to this population as they navigate the CJS.
Original languageEnglish
Article number157
JournalBMC medicine
Volume22
Issue number1
Early online date12 Apr 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Dec 2024

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Funding

None of the authors received any financial compensation for their contributions.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Autism
  • Crime
  • Criminal justice system (CJS)
  • Forensics
  • Offending
  • Risk
  • Support

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Identification and support of autistic individuals within the UK Criminal Justice System: A practical approach based upon professional consensus with input from lived experience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this