Human resource management on the line?

Patrick McGovern, Lynda Gratton, Veronica Hope Hailey, Philip Stiles, Catherine Truss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

142 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The prospects for devolving HR activities to the line are examined in this article. Evidence drawn from a wider study of HRM in practice suggests that, while line manager involvement is possible, their practices tend to be inconsistent in implementation and uneven in quality. A number of constraints on line management practice were identified. First, there is limited reinforcement of practice through institutional forces. Secondly, the short-term nature of managerial activity means that a greater priority is placed on the achievement of the numbers rather than the achievement of numbers through people. Finally, downsizing and delayering place tremendous pressures on the time which line managers could allow for people matters generally. These findings challenge much of the rhetoric associated with the idea of giving HRM back to the line by arguing that the quality of line management practice may distort the overall impact of HR policies
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)12-29
JournalHuman Resource Management Journal
Volume7
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 1997

Fingerprint

Human resource management
Management practices
Line managers
Line management
Reinforcement
Downsizing
Rhetoric

Cite this

Human resource management on the line? / McGovern, Patrick; Gratton, Lynda; Hope Hailey, Veronica; Stiles, Philip; Truss, Catherine.

In: Human Resource Management Journal, Vol. 7, No. 4, 07.1997, p. 12-29.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McGovern, Patrick ; Gratton, Lynda ; Hope Hailey, Veronica ; Stiles, Philip ; Truss, Catherine. / Human resource management on the line?. In: Human Resource Management Journal. 1997 ; Vol. 7, No. 4. pp. 12-29.
@article{af15325dbcab4139addc303be238e4c7,
title = "Human resource management on the line?",
abstract = "The prospects for devolving HR activities to the line are examined in this article. Evidence drawn from a wider study of HRM in practice suggests that, while line manager involvement is possible, their practices tend to be inconsistent in implementation and uneven in quality. A number of constraints on line management practice were identified. First, there is limited reinforcement of practice through institutional forces. Secondly, the short-term nature of managerial activity means that a greater priority is placed on the achievement of the numbers rather than the achievement of numbers through people. Finally, downsizing and delayering place tremendous pressures on the time which line managers could allow for people matters generally. These findings challenge much of the rhetoric associated with the idea of giving HRM back to the line by arguing that the quality of line management practice may distort the overall impact of HR policies",
author = "Patrick McGovern and Lynda Gratton and {Hope Hailey}, Veronica and Philip Stiles and Catherine Truss",
year = "1997",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1111/j.1748-8583.1997.tb00286.x",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "12--29",
journal = "Human Resource Management Journal",
issn = "0954-5395",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Human resource management on the line?

AU - McGovern, Patrick

AU - Gratton, Lynda

AU - Hope Hailey, Veronica

AU - Stiles, Philip

AU - Truss, Catherine

PY - 1997/7

Y1 - 1997/7

N2 - The prospects for devolving HR activities to the line are examined in this article. Evidence drawn from a wider study of HRM in practice suggests that, while line manager involvement is possible, their practices tend to be inconsistent in implementation and uneven in quality. A number of constraints on line management practice were identified. First, there is limited reinforcement of practice through institutional forces. Secondly, the short-term nature of managerial activity means that a greater priority is placed on the achievement of the numbers rather than the achievement of numbers through people. Finally, downsizing and delayering place tremendous pressures on the time which line managers could allow for people matters generally. These findings challenge much of the rhetoric associated with the idea of giving HRM back to the line by arguing that the quality of line management practice may distort the overall impact of HR policies

AB - The prospects for devolving HR activities to the line are examined in this article. Evidence drawn from a wider study of HRM in practice suggests that, while line manager involvement is possible, their practices tend to be inconsistent in implementation and uneven in quality. A number of constraints on line management practice were identified. First, there is limited reinforcement of practice through institutional forces. Secondly, the short-term nature of managerial activity means that a greater priority is placed on the achievement of the numbers rather than the achievement of numbers through people. Finally, downsizing and delayering place tremendous pressures on the time which line managers could allow for people matters generally. These findings challenge much of the rhetoric associated with the idea of giving HRM back to the line by arguing that the quality of line management practice may distort the overall impact of HR policies

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.1997.tb00286.x

U2 - 10.1111/j.1748-8583.1997.tb00286.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1748-8583.1997.tb00286.x

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 12

EP - 29

JO - Human Resource Management Journal

JF - Human Resource Management Journal

SN - 0954-5395

IS - 4

ER -