How robust is your project? from local failures to global catastrophes

a complex networks approach to project systemic risk

Christos Ellinas, Neil Allan, Christopher Durugbo, Anders Johansson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)
88 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Current societal requirements necessitate the effective delivery of complex projects that can do more while using less. Yet, recent large-scale project failures suggest that our ability to successfully deliver them is still at its infancy. Such failures can be seen to arise through various failure mechanisms; this work focuses on one such mechanism. Specifically, it examines the likelihood of a project sustaining a large-scale catastrophe, as triggered by single task failure and delivered via a cascading process. To do so, an analytical model was developed and tested on an empirical dataset by the means of numerical simulation. This paper makes three main contributions. First, it provides a methodology to identify the tasks most capable of impacting a project. In doing so, it is noted that a significant number of tasks induce no cascades, while a handful are capable of triggering surprisingly large ones. Secondly, it illustrates that crude task characteristics cannot aid in identifying them, highlighting the complexity of the underlying process and the utility of this approach. Thirdly, it draws parallels with systems encountered within the natural sciences by noting the emergence of self-organised criticality, commonly found within natural systems. These findings strengthen the need to account for structural intricacies of a project's underlying task precedence structure as they can provide the conditions upon which large-scale catastrophes materialise.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0142469
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume10
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2015

Fingerprint

Natural Science Disciplines
Natural sciences
Complex networks
infancy
Analytical models
Computer simulation
methodology
Datasets

Cite this

How robust is your project? from local failures to global catastrophes : a complex networks approach to project systemic risk. / Ellinas, Christos; Allan, Neil; Durugbo, Christopher; Johansson, Anders.

In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 10, No. 11, e0142469, 01.11.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ellinas, Christos ; Allan, Neil ; Durugbo, Christopher ; Johansson, Anders. / How robust is your project? from local failures to global catastrophes : a complex networks approach to project systemic risk. In: PLoS ONE. 2015 ; Vol. 10, No. 11.
@article{ce986c388f2143d7be57da353d517af1,
title = "How robust is your project? from local failures to global catastrophes: a complex networks approach to project systemic risk",
abstract = "Current societal requirements necessitate the effective delivery of complex projects that can do more while using less. Yet, recent large-scale project failures suggest that our ability to successfully deliver them is still at its infancy. Such failures can be seen to arise through various failure mechanisms; this work focuses on one such mechanism. Specifically, it examines the likelihood of a project sustaining a large-scale catastrophe, as triggered by single task failure and delivered via a cascading process. To do so, an analytical model was developed and tested on an empirical dataset by the means of numerical simulation. This paper makes three main contributions. First, it provides a methodology to identify the tasks most capable of impacting a project. In doing so, it is noted that a significant number of tasks induce no cascades, while a handful are capable of triggering surprisingly large ones. Secondly, it illustrates that crude task characteristics cannot aid in identifying them, highlighting the complexity of the underlying process and the utility of this approach. Thirdly, it draws parallels with systems encountered within the natural sciences by noting the emergence of self-organised criticality, commonly found within natural systems. These findings strengthen the need to account for structural intricacies of a project's underlying task precedence structure as they can provide the conditions upon which large-scale catastrophes materialise.",
author = "Christos Ellinas and Neil Allan and Christopher Durugbo and Anders Johansson",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0142469",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science (PLOS)",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How robust is your project? from local failures to global catastrophes

T2 - a complex networks approach to project systemic risk

AU - Ellinas, Christos

AU - Allan, Neil

AU - Durugbo, Christopher

AU - Johansson, Anders

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - Current societal requirements necessitate the effective delivery of complex projects that can do more while using less. Yet, recent large-scale project failures suggest that our ability to successfully deliver them is still at its infancy. Such failures can be seen to arise through various failure mechanisms; this work focuses on one such mechanism. Specifically, it examines the likelihood of a project sustaining a large-scale catastrophe, as triggered by single task failure and delivered via a cascading process. To do so, an analytical model was developed and tested on an empirical dataset by the means of numerical simulation. This paper makes three main contributions. First, it provides a methodology to identify the tasks most capable of impacting a project. In doing so, it is noted that a significant number of tasks induce no cascades, while a handful are capable of triggering surprisingly large ones. Secondly, it illustrates that crude task characteristics cannot aid in identifying them, highlighting the complexity of the underlying process and the utility of this approach. Thirdly, it draws parallels with systems encountered within the natural sciences by noting the emergence of self-organised criticality, commonly found within natural systems. These findings strengthen the need to account for structural intricacies of a project's underlying task precedence structure as they can provide the conditions upon which large-scale catastrophes materialise.

AB - Current societal requirements necessitate the effective delivery of complex projects that can do more while using less. Yet, recent large-scale project failures suggest that our ability to successfully deliver them is still at its infancy. Such failures can be seen to arise through various failure mechanisms; this work focuses on one such mechanism. Specifically, it examines the likelihood of a project sustaining a large-scale catastrophe, as triggered by single task failure and delivered via a cascading process. To do so, an analytical model was developed and tested on an empirical dataset by the means of numerical simulation. This paper makes three main contributions. First, it provides a methodology to identify the tasks most capable of impacting a project. In doing so, it is noted that a significant number of tasks induce no cascades, while a handful are capable of triggering surprisingly large ones. Secondly, it illustrates that crude task characteristics cannot aid in identifying them, highlighting the complexity of the underlying process and the utility of this approach. Thirdly, it draws parallels with systems encountered within the natural sciences by noting the emergence of self-organised criticality, commonly found within natural systems. These findings strengthen the need to account for structural intricacies of a project's underlying task precedence structure as they can provide the conditions upon which large-scale catastrophes materialise.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959441368&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142469

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142469

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0142469

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0142469

M3 - Article

VL - 10

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 11

M1 - e0142469

ER -