How reliable are scientific studies?

Marcus R. Munafò, Jonathan Flint

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

31 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

There is growing concern that a substantial proportion of scientific research may in fact be false. A number of factors have been proposed as contributing to the presence of a large number of false-positive results in the literature, one of which is publication bias. We discuss empirical evidence for these factors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)257-258
Number of pages2
JournalBritish Journal of Psychiatry
Volume197
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Oct 2010

Acknowledgements

Published scholarly articles were used as sources of information for the article. M.R.M. is guarantor for the article.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How reliable are scientific studies?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this