How participative is open source hardware? Insights from online repository mining

Jeremy Bonvoisin, Tom Buchert, Maurice Preidel, Rainer Stark

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Open Source Hardware (OSH) is an increasingly viable approach to intellectual property management extending the principles of Open Source Software (OSS) to the domain of physical products. These principles support the development of products in transparent processes allowing the participation of any interested person. While increasing numbers of products have been released as OSH, little is known on the prevalence of participative development practices in this emerging field. It remains unclear to which extent the transparent and participatory processes known from software reached hardware product development. To fill this gap, this paper applies repository mining techniques to investigate the transparency and workload distribution of 105 OSH product development projects. The results highlight a certain heterogeneity of practices filling a continuum between public and private development settings. They reveal different organizational patterns with different levels of centralization and distribution. Nonetheless, they clearly indicate the expansion of the open source development model from software into the realms of physical products and provide the first large-scale empirical evidence of this recent evolution. Therewith, this article gives body to an emerging phenomenon and contributes to give it a place in the scientific debate. It delivers categories to delineate practices, techniques to investigate them in further detail as well as a large dataset of exemplary OSH projects. The discussion of first results signposts avenues for a stream of research aiming at understanding stakeholder interactions at work in new product innovation practices in order to enable institutions and industry in providing appropriate responses.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere19
Number of pages31
JournalDesign Science
Volume4
Early online date21 Nov 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • open source hardware
  • open source innovation
  • open design
  • open innovation
  • repository mining
  • social network analysis
  • community-based product development
  • Git
  • GitHub

Cite this

How participative is open source hardware? Insights from online repository mining. / Bonvoisin, Jeremy; Buchert, Tom; Preidel, Maurice; Stark, Rainer.

In: Design Science, Vol. 4, e19, 2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bonvoisin, Jeremy ; Buchert, Tom ; Preidel, Maurice ; Stark, Rainer. / How participative is open source hardware? Insights from online repository mining. In: Design Science. 2018 ; Vol. 4.
@article{61a52103d4b643bfb9a5580198986710,
title = "How participative is open source hardware? Insights from online repository mining",
abstract = "Open Source Hardware (OSH) is an increasingly viable approach to intellectual property management extending the principles of Open Source Software (OSS) to the domain of physical products. These principles support the development of products in transparent processes allowing the participation of any interested person. While increasing numbers of products have been released as OSH, little is known on the prevalence of participative development practices in this emerging field. It remains unclear to which extent the transparent and participatory processes known from software reached hardware product development. To fill this gap, this paper applies repository mining techniques to investigate the transparency and workload distribution of 105 OSH product development projects. The results highlight a certain heterogeneity of practices filling a continuum between public and private development settings. They reveal different organizational patterns with different levels of centralization and distribution. Nonetheless, they clearly indicate the expansion of the open source development model from software into the realms of physical products and provide the first large-scale empirical evidence of this recent evolution. Therewith, this article gives body to an emerging phenomenon and contributes to give it a place in the scientific debate. It delivers categories to delineate practices, techniques to investigate them in further detail as well as a large dataset of exemplary OSH projects. The discussion of first results signposts avenues for a stream of research aiming at understanding stakeholder interactions at work in new product innovation practices in order to enable institutions and industry in providing appropriate responses.",
keywords = "open source hardware, open source innovation, open design, open innovation, repository mining, social network analysis, community-based product development, Git, GitHub",
author = "Jeremy Bonvoisin and Tom Buchert and Maurice Preidel and Rainer Stark",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1017/dsj.2018.15",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
journal = "Design Science",
issn = "2053-4701",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How participative is open source hardware? Insights from online repository mining

AU - Bonvoisin, Jeremy

AU - Buchert, Tom

AU - Preidel, Maurice

AU - Stark, Rainer

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Open Source Hardware (OSH) is an increasingly viable approach to intellectual property management extending the principles of Open Source Software (OSS) to the domain of physical products. These principles support the development of products in transparent processes allowing the participation of any interested person. While increasing numbers of products have been released as OSH, little is known on the prevalence of participative development practices in this emerging field. It remains unclear to which extent the transparent and participatory processes known from software reached hardware product development. To fill this gap, this paper applies repository mining techniques to investigate the transparency and workload distribution of 105 OSH product development projects. The results highlight a certain heterogeneity of practices filling a continuum between public and private development settings. They reveal different organizational patterns with different levels of centralization and distribution. Nonetheless, they clearly indicate the expansion of the open source development model from software into the realms of physical products and provide the first large-scale empirical evidence of this recent evolution. Therewith, this article gives body to an emerging phenomenon and contributes to give it a place in the scientific debate. It delivers categories to delineate practices, techniques to investigate them in further detail as well as a large dataset of exemplary OSH projects. The discussion of first results signposts avenues for a stream of research aiming at understanding stakeholder interactions at work in new product innovation practices in order to enable institutions and industry in providing appropriate responses.

AB - Open Source Hardware (OSH) is an increasingly viable approach to intellectual property management extending the principles of Open Source Software (OSS) to the domain of physical products. These principles support the development of products in transparent processes allowing the participation of any interested person. While increasing numbers of products have been released as OSH, little is known on the prevalence of participative development practices in this emerging field. It remains unclear to which extent the transparent and participatory processes known from software reached hardware product development. To fill this gap, this paper applies repository mining techniques to investigate the transparency and workload distribution of 105 OSH product development projects. The results highlight a certain heterogeneity of practices filling a continuum between public and private development settings. They reveal different organizational patterns with different levels of centralization and distribution. Nonetheless, they clearly indicate the expansion of the open source development model from software into the realms of physical products and provide the first large-scale empirical evidence of this recent evolution. Therewith, this article gives body to an emerging phenomenon and contributes to give it a place in the scientific debate. It delivers categories to delineate practices, techniques to investigate them in further detail as well as a large dataset of exemplary OSH projects. The discussion of first results signposts avenues for a stream of research aiming at understanding stakeholder interactions at work in new product innovation practices in order to enable institutions and industry in providing appropriate responses.

KW - open source hardware

KW - open source innovation

KW - open design

KW - open innovation

KW - repository mining

KW - social network analysis

KW - community-based product development

KW - Git

KW - GitHub

U2 - 10.1017/dsj.2018.15

DO - 10.1017/dsj.2018.15

M3 - Article

VL - 4

JO - Design Science

JF - Design Science

SN - 2053-4701

M1 - e19

ER -