How Much Is Enough in a Perfect World? Cultural Variation in Ideal Levels of Happiness, Pleasure, Freedom, Health, Self-Esteem, Longevity, and Intelligence

Matthew J. Hornsey, Paul G. Bain, Emily A. Harris, Nadezhda Lebedeva, Emiko S. Kashima, Yanjun Guan, Roberto González, Sylvia Xiaohua Chen, Sheyla Blumen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)
32 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The maximization principle—that people aspire to the highest possible level of something good if all practical constraints are removed—is a common yet untested assumption about human nature. We predict that in holistic cultures—where contradiction, change, and context are emphasized—ideal states of being for the self will be more moderate than in other cultures. In two studies (Ns = 2,392 and 6,239), we asked this question: If participants could choose their ideal level of happiness, pleasure, freedom, health, self-esteem, longevity, and intelligence, what level would they choose? Consistent with predictions, results showed that maximization was less pronounced in holistic cultures; members of holistic cultures aspired to less happiness, pleasure, freedom, health, self-esteem, longevity, and IQ than did members of other cultures. In contrast, no differences emerged on ideals for society. The studies show that the maximization principle is not a universal aspect of human nature and that there are predictable cultural differences in people’s notions of perfection.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1393-1404
Number of pages12
JournalPsychological Science
Volume29
Issue number9
Early online date11 Jun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2018

Fingerprint

Happiness
Pleasure
Intelligence
Self Concept
Ego
Health

Keywords

  • cross-cultural differences
  • social influences

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

How Much Is Enough in a Perfect World? Cultural Variation in Ideal Levels of Happiness, Pleasure, Freedom, Health, Self-Esteem, Longevity, and Intelligence. / Hornsey, Matthew J.; Bain, Paul G.; Harris, Emily A.; Lebedeva, Nadezhda; Kashima, Emiko S.; Guan, Yanjun; González, Roberto; Chen, Sylvia Xiaohua; Blumen, Sheyla.

In: Psychological Science, Vol. 29, No. 9, 01.09.2018, p. 1393-1404.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hornsey, Matthew J. ; Bain, Paul G. ; Harris, Emily A. ; Lebedeva, Nadezhda ; Kashima, Emiko S. ; Guan, Yanjun ; González, Roberto ; Chen, Sylvia Xiaohua ; Blumen, Sheyla. / How Much Is Enough in a Perfect World? Cultural Variation in Ideal Levels of Happiness, Pleasure, Freedom, Health, Self-Esteem, Longevity, and Intelligence. In: Psychological Science. 2018 ; Vol. 29, No. 9. pp. 1393-1404.
@article{d6d8c8d2cfa941e280f7135368e622f9,
title = "How Much Is Enough in a Perfect World? Cultural Variation in Ideal Levels of Happiness, Pleasure, Freedom, Health, Self-Esteem, Longevity, and Intelligence",
abstract = "The maximization principle—that people aspire to the highest possible level of something good if all practical constraints are removed—is a common yet untested assumption about human nature. We predict that in holistic cultures—where contradiction, change, and context are emphasized—ideal states of being for the self will be more moderate than in other cultures. In two studies (Ns = 2,392 and 6,239), we asked this question: If participants could choose their ideal level of happiness, pleasure, freedom, health, self-esteem, longevity, and intelligence, what level would they choose? Consistent with predictions, results showed that maximization was less pronounced in holistic cultures; members of holistic cultures aspired to less happiness, pleasure, freedom, health, self-esteem, longevity, and IQ than did members of other cultures. In contrast, no differences emerged on ideals for society. The studies show that the maximization principle is not a universal aspect of human nature and that there are predictable cultural differences in people’s notions of perfection.",
keywords = "cross-cultural differences, social influences",
author = "Hornsey, {Matthew J.} and Bain, {Paul G.} and Harris, {Emily A.} and Nadezhda Lebedeva and Kashima, {Emiko S.} and Yanjun Guan and Roberto Gonz{\'a}lez and Chen, {Sylvia Xiaohua} and Sheyla Blumen",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0956797618768058",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "1393--1404",
journal = "The Psychological Science",
issn = "0956-7976",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Much Is Enough in a Perfect World? Cultural Variation in Ideal Levels of Happiness, Pleasure, Freedom, Health, Self-Esteem, Longevity, and Intelligence

AU - Hornsey, Matthew J.

AU - Bain, Paul G.

AU - Harris, Emily A.

AU - Lebedeva, Nadezhda

AU - Kashima, Emiko S.

AU - Guan, Yanjun

AU - González, Roberto

AU - Chen, Sylvia Xiaohua

AU - Blumen, Sheyla

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - The maximization principle—that people aspire to the highest possible level of something good if all practical constraints are removed—is a common yet untested assumption about human nature. We predict that in holistic cultures—where contradiction, change, and context are emphasized—ideal states of being for the self will be more moderate than in other cultures. In two studies (Ns = 2,392 and 6,239), we asked this question: If participants could choose their ideal level of happiness, pleasure, freedom, health, self-esteem, longevity, and intelligence, what level would they choose? Consistent with predictions, results showed that maximization was less pronounced in holistic cultures; members of holistic cultures aspired to less happiness, pleasure, freedom, health, self-esteem, longevity, and IQ than did members of other cultures. In contrast, no differences emerged on ideals for society. The studies show that the maximization principle is not a universal aspect of human nature and that there are predictable cultural differences in people’s notions of perfection.

AB - The maximization principle—that people aspire to the highest possible level of something good if all practical constraints are removed—is a common yet untested assumption about human nature. We predict that in holistic cultures—where contradiction, change, and context are emphasized—ideal states of being for the self will be more moderate than in other cultures. In two studies (Ns = 2,392 and 6,239), we asked this question: If participants could choose their ideal level of happiness, pleasure, freedom, health, self-esteem, longevity, and intelligence, what level would they choose? Consistent with predictions, results showed that maximization was less pronounced in holistic cultures; members of holistic cultures aspired to less happiness, pleasure, freedom, health, self-esteem, longevity, and IQ than did members of other cultures. In contrast, no differences emerged on ideals for society. The studies show that the maximization principle is not a universal aspect of human nature and that there are predictable cultural differences in people’s notions of perfection.

KW - cross-cultural differences

KW - social influences

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048774136&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0956797618768058

DO - 10.1177/0956797618768058

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85048774136

VL - 29

SP - 1393

EP - 1404

JO - The Psychological Science

JF - The Psychological Science

SN - 0956-7976

IS - 9

ER -