Abstract
This article explores some aspects of what happens, and what can happen, in the complex practice we commonly refer to as “thinking.” Of all the practices involved in the messy processes we call research, “thinking” is perhaps the most pervasive and widespread. Yet, it also remains the most opaque. Thinking happens, but it is seldom spoken about. The theories we normally engage with never say how they come about. Surely, philosophers of various traditions have dedicated countless pages to the question of what thought is, and some social scientists have recently attempted to theorize “methods” of theorizing in research. Such accounts, however, tend to remain at odds with the hesitant, playful, and profoundly eventful experience of thinking-feeling in and through research. The experience, that is, that thoughts often think other thoughts, that they happen to us, and that thinking therefore involves an art of learning to confer on ideas the capacity to make us think. In this article, I seek not to make grand claims about the nature of thought, but to make perceptible the dramatic and perplexing experience that thinking can constitute. In so doing, I draw on the work of philosopher of heuristics, Judith Schlanger, whose central aim has been to come to terms with the adventure of what she terms “intellectual invention.” The task is to open up a different—if never fully transparent—conversation about how it feels to think.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 609-616 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Qualitative Inquiry |
Volume | 24 |
Issue number | 9 |
Early online date | 5 Oct 2017 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Nov 2018 |
Keywords
- heuristics
- intellectual invention
- Judith Schlanger
- pragmatism
- sociology of ideas
- William James
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Anthropology
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)