How does the norm on non-interference affect peace in East Asia?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The question of interference and non-interference has been at the heart of the theory of international relations, especially the study of ASEAN and Northeast Asian politics and security. There has not been much consensus in the debate on the merits of interference. While it has been suggested that lowering borders can bring peace as it did in Western Europe after the Second World War, respect for sovereignty, which includes the principle of non-interference in domestic affairs, has been seen as a source of stability in the post-Westphalian world order. Finally, it has been suggested that regardless of its merits in the prevention of conflict, interference could be useful if it prevented state repression of vulnerable citizens and offered human security and humanitarian intervention in genocidal state practices. This article explicates the East Asian concept of non-interference, looks at the merits and problems in interference and finally concludes by referring to statistical evidence that the practice of non-interference in East Asia has been crucial for the near-disappearance of battle deaths in the region after 1979.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1146-1169
JournalAsian Survey
Volume55
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2015

Fingerprint

interference
peace
ASEAN
Westphalian
international relations
sovereignty
politics
humanitarian intervention
human security
world order
repression
World War
Western Europe
respect
citizen
death
Asia
norm
evidence
border

Cite this

How does the norm on non-interference affect peace in East Asia? / Kivimaki, Timo.

In: Asian Survey, Vol. 55, No. 6, 11.2015, p. 1146-1169.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{43e160d0e8cf4a8795a93017d2854727,
title = "How does the norm on non-interference affect peace in East Asia?",
abstract = "The question of interference and non-interference has been at the heart of the theory of international relations, especially the study of ASEAN and Northeast Asian politics and security. There has not been much consensus in the debate on the merits of interference. While it has been suggested that lowering borders can bring peace as it did in Western Europe after the Second World War, respect for sovereignty, which includes the principle of non-interference in domestic affairs, has been seen as a source of stability in the post-Westphalian world order. Finally, it has been suggested that regardless of its merits in the prevention of conflict, interference could be useful if it prevented state repression of vulnerable citizens and offered human security and humanitarian intervention in genocidal state practices. This article explicates the East Asian concept of non-interference, looks at the merits and problems in interference and finally concludes by referring to statistical evidence that the practice of non-interference in East Asia has been crucial for the near-disappearance of battle deaths in the region after 1979.",
author = "Timo Kivimaki",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1525/as.2015.55.6.1146",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "1146--1169",
journal = "Asian Survey",
issn = "0004-4687",
publisher = "University of California Press",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How does the norm on non-interference affect peace in East Asia?

AU - Kivimaki, Timo

PY - 2015/11

Y1 - 2015/11

N2 - The question of interference and non-interference has been at the heart of the theory of international relations, especially the study of ASEAN and Northeast Asian politics and security. There has not been much consensus in the debate on the merits of interference. While it has been suggested that lowering borders can bring peace as it did in Western Europe after the Second World War, respect for sovereignty, which includes the principle of non-interference in domestic affairs, has been seen as a source of stability in the post-Westphalian world order. Finally, it has been suggested that regardless of its merits in the prevention of conflict, interference could be useful if it prevented state repression of vulnerable citizens and offered human security and humanitarian intervention in genocidal state practices. This article explicates the East Asian concept of non-interference, looks at the merits and problems in interference and finally concludes by referring to statistical evidence that the practice of non-interference in East Asia has been crucial for the near-disappearance of battle deaths in the region after 1979.

AB - The question of interference and non-interference has been at the heart of the theory of international relations, especially the study of ASEAN and Northeast Asian politics and security. There has not been much consensus in the debate on the merits of interference. While it has been suggested that lowering borders can bring peace as it did in Western Europe after the Second World War, respect for sovereignty, which includes the principle of non-interference in domestic affairs, has been seen as a source of stability in the post-Westphalian world order. Finally, it has been suggested that regardless of its merits in the prevention of conflict, interference could be useful if it prevented state repression of vulnerable citizens and offered human security and humanitarian intervention in genocidal state practices. This article explicates the East Asian concept of non-interference, looks at the merits and problems in interference and finally concludes by referring to statistical evidence that the practice of non-interference in East Asia has been crucial for the near-disappearance of battle deaths in the region after 1979.

UR - http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublication?journalCode=asiansurvey&

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/as.2015.55.6.1146

U2 - 10.1525/as.2015.55.6.1146

DO - 10.1525/as.2015.55.6.1146

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 1146

EP - 1169

JO - Asian Survey

JF - Asian Survey

SN - 0004-4687

IS - 6

ER -