How appropriate is the WHOQOL-BREF for assessing the quality of life of adolescents?

S. M. Skevington, S. Dehner, F. B. Gillison, E. J. McGrath, C. R. Lovell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Using mixed-methods research, we investigated whether the adult version of the WHOQOL-BREF was acceptable and feasible to use with adolescents (13–19), and what features might need to be changed to develop it. Differences from young adults quality of life (QoL) (20–30 years) could add justification.

Methods: Preliminary psychometric properties of the adult WHOQOL-BREF were examined in 208 adolescents and 204 young adults. Unhealthy adolescents diagnosed with acne or elevated depressive symptoms (CES-D) were compared with healthy adolescents. Cognitive interviewing used ‘think aloud’ techniques with six healthy adolescents during WHOQOL-BREF completion. Concepts and wording were thematically analysed for relevance, comprehension and comprehensiveness.

Results: Little data were missing from the WHOQOL-BREF suggesting some feasibility and acceptability to adolescents. Compared with adults, adolescents perceived greater access to information, a better home environment, worse pain, and medication dependency. Internal consistency reliability for adolescents was good (α = .89), especially psychological and environmental QoL. Content validity especially for social and environment domains was supported. Domains validly discriminated between high- and low-depressive symptoms but not acne groups. Additional new facets on autonomy, altruism and physical fitness and changed item contents are proposed.

Conclusion: The evidence indicates that developing a new adolescent version is justifiable. Cross-cultural research should build on these preliminary findings.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)297-317
Number of pages21
JournalPsychology & Health
Volume29
Issue number3
Early online date6 Nov 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Mar 2014

Fingerprint

Quality of Life
Acne Vulgaris
Young Adult
Depression
Altruism
Access to Information
Physical Fitness
Social Environment
Research
Psychometrics
Psychology
Pain

Cite this

How appropriate is the WHOQOL-BREF for assessing the quality of life of adolescents? / Skevington, S. M.; Dehner, S.; Gillison, F. B.; McGrath, E. J.; Lovell, C. R.

In: Psychology & Health, Vol. 29, No. 3, 04.03.2014, p. 297-317.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Skevington, S. M. ; Dehner, S. ; Gillison, F. B. ; McGrath, E. J. ; Lovell, C. R. / How appropriate is the WHOQOL-BREF for assessing the quality of life of adolescents?. In: Psychology & Health. 2014 ; Vol. 29, No. 3. pp. 297-317.
@article{8a2255583ae74eaaa6501cd14e4919cc,
title = "How appropriate is the WHOQOL-BREF for assessing the quality of life of adolescents?",
abstract = "Background: Using mixed-methods research, we investigated whether the adult version of the WHOQOL-BREF was acceptable and feasible to use with adolescents (13–19), and what features might need to be changed to develop it. Differences from young adults quality of life (QoL) (20–30 years) could add justification.Methods: Preliminary psychometric properties of the adult WHOQOL-BREF were examined in 208 adolescents and 204 young adults. Unhealthy adolescents diagnosed with acne or elevated depressive symptoms (CES-D) were compared with healthy adolescents. Cognitive interviewing used ‘think aloud’ techniques with six healthy adolescents during WHOQOL-BREF completion. Concepts and wording were thematically analysed for relevance, comprehension and comprehensiveness.Results: Little data were missing from the WHOQOL-BREF suggesting some feasibility and acceptability to adolescents. Compared with adults, adolescents perceived greater access to information, a better home environment, worse pain, and medication dependency. Internal consistency reliability for adolescents was good (α = .89), especially psychological and environmental QoL. Content validity especially for social and environment domains was supported. Domains validly discriminated between high- and low-depressive symptoms but not acne groups. Additional new facets on autonomy, altruism and physical fitness and changed item contents are proposed.Conclusion: The evidence indicates that developing a new adolescent version is justifiable. Cross-cultural research should build on these preliminary findings.",
author = "Skevington, {S. M.} and S. Dehner and Gillison, {F. B.} and McGrath, {E. J.} and Lovell, {C. R.}",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/08870446.2013.845668",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "297--317",
journal = "Psychology & Health",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How appropriate is the WHOQOL-BREF for assessing the quality of life of adolescents?

AU - Skevington, S. M.

AU - Dehner, S.

AU - Gillison, F. B.

AU - McGrath, E. J.

AU - Lovell, C. R.

PY - 2014/3/4

Y1 - 2014/3/4

N2 - Background: Using mixed-methods research, we investigated whether the adult version of the WHOQOL-BREF was acceptable and feasible to use with adolescents (13–19), and what features might need to be changed to develop it. Differences from young adults quality of life (QoL) (20–30 years) could add justification.Methods: Preliminary psychometric properties of the adult WHOQOL-BREF were examined in 208 adolescents and 204 young adults. Unhealthy adolescents diagnosed with acne or elevated depressive symptoms (CES-D) were compared with healthy adolescents. Cognitive interviewing used ‘think aloud’ techniques with six healthy adolescents during WHOQOL-BREF completion. Concepts and wording were thematically analysed for relevance, comprehension and comprehensiveness.Results: Little data were missing from the WHOQOL-BREF suggesting some feasibility and acceptability to adolescents. Compared with adults, adolescents perceived greater access to information, a better home environment, worse pain, and medication dependency. Internal consistency reliability for adolescents was good (α = .89), especially psychological and environmental QoL. Content validity especially for social and environment domains was supported. Domains validly discriminated between high- and low-depressive symptoms but not acne groups. Additional new facets on autonomy, altruism and physical fitness and changed item contents are proposed.Conclusion: The evidence indicates that developing a new adolescent version is justifiable. Cross-cultural research should build on these preliminary findings.

AB - Background: Using mixed-methods research, we investigated whether the adult version of the WHOQOL-BREF was acceptable and feasible to use with adolescents (13–19), and what features might need to be changed to develop it. Differences from young adults quality of life (QoL) (20–30 years) could add justification.Methods: Preliminary psychometric properties of the adult WHOQOL-BREF were examined in 208 adolescents and 204 young adults. Unhealthy adolescents diagnosed with acne or elevated depressive symptoms (CES-D) were compared with healthy adolescents. Cognitive interviewing used ‘think aloud’ techniques with six healthy adolescents during WHOQOL-BREF completion. Concepts and wording were thematically analysed for relevance, comprehension and comprehensiveness.Results: Little data were missing from the WHOQOL-BREF suggesting some feasibility and acceptability to adolescents. Compared with adults, adolescents perceived greater access to information, a better home environment, worse pain, and medication dependency. Internal consistency reliability for adolescents was good (α = .89), especially psychological and environmental QoL. Content validity especially for social and environment domains was supported. Domains validly discriminated between high- and low-depressive symptoms but not acne groups. Additional new facets on autonomy, altruism and physical fitness and changed item contents are proposed.Conclusion: The evidence indicates that developing a new adolescent version is justifiable. Cross-cultural research should build on these preliminary findings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892497596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2013.845668

U2 - 10.1080/08870446.2013.845668

DO - 10.1080/08870446.2013.845668

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 297

EP - 317

JO - Psychology & Health

JF - Psychology & Health

IS - 3

ER -