Hosts' responses to parasitic eggs

Which cues elicit hosts' egg discrimination?

C Moskat, T Szekely, I C Cuthill, T Kisbenedek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many hosts of the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) exhibit egg recognition, and reject parasitic eggs. How do hosts discriminate cuckoo eggs from their own? Hosts might be able to recognize their own eggs using the specific pigment pattern on the outer eggshell surface, which may serve as a cue for recognition. We tested if patterns of egg pigments (spottedness) contain this information by manipulating spot density of great reed warbler eggs (Acrocephalus arundinaceus). We also manipulated the colour of eggs when the original spot pattern remained the same. Spot density (approximately 15-75%) did not significantly affect rejection rate (8-20% rejection), but when spots fully covered the eggs, i.e. the eggshell was plain dark brown, rejection rate increased abruptly to 100%. A loglinear model revealed the significant influence of colour on rejection rates, although there was no interactive effect between spottedness and colour. Our results strongly support the differential use of egg markers in host's egg discrimination, suggesting that spot density has limited importance compared to eggshell colour.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)186-194
Number of pages9
JournalEthology
Volume114
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2008

Fingerprint

egg shell
egg
Cuculus canorus
color
pigments
eggshell
pigment
Acrocephalus arundinaceus
rate

Cite this

Hosts' responses to parasitic eggs : Which cues elicit hosts' egg discrimination? / Moskat, C; Szekely, T; Cuthill, I C; Kisbenedek, T.

In: Ethology, Vol. 114, No. 2, 02.2008, p. 186-194.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Moskat, C ; Szekely, T ; Cuthill, I C ; Kisbenedek, T. / Hosts' responses to parasitic eggs : Which cues elicit hosts' egg discrimination?. In: Ethology. 2008 ; Vol. 114, No. 2. pp. 186-194.
@article{122a9477ed6544c5ad24ce4b46b744bf,
title = "Hosts' responses to parasitic eggs: Which cues elicit hosts' egg discrimination?",
abstract = "Many hosts of the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) exhibit egg recognition, and reject parasitic eggs. How do hosts discriminate cuckoo eggs from their own? Hosts might be able to recognize their own eggs using the specific pigment pattern on the outer eggshell surface, which may serve as a cue for recognition. We tested if patterns of egg pigments (spottedness) contain this information by manipulating spot density of great reed warbler eggs (Acrocephalus arundinaceus). We also manipulated the colour of eggs when the original spot pattern remained the same. Spot density (approximately 15-75{\%}) did not significantly affect rejection rate (8-20{\%} rejection), but when spots fully covered the eggs, i.e. the eggshell was plain dark brown, rejection rate increased abruptly to 100{\%}. A loglinear model revealed the significant influence of colour on rejection rates, although there was no interactive effect between spottedness and colour. Our results strongly support the differential use of egg markers in host's egg discrimination, suggesting that spot density has limited importance compared to eggshell colour.",
author = "C Moskat and T Szekely and Cuthill, {I C} and T Kisbenedek",
note = "ID number: ISI:000252393300009",
year = "2008",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1111/j.1439-0310.2007.01456.x",
language = "English",
volume = "114",
pages = "186--194",
journal = "Ethology",
issn = "0179-1613",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hosts' responses to parasitic eggs

T2 - Which cues elicit hosts' egg discrimination?

AU - Moskat, C

AU - Szekely, T

AU - Cuthill, I C

AU - Kisbenedek, T

N1 - ID number: ISI:000252393300009

PY - 2008/2

Y1 - 2008/2

N2 - Many hosts of the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) exhibit egg recognition, and reject parasitic eggs. How do hosts discriminate cuckoo eggs from their own? Hosts might be able to recognize their own eggs using the specific pigment pattern on the outer eggshell surface, which may serve as a cue for recognition. We tested if patterns of egg pigments (spottedness) contain this information by manipulating spot density of great reed warbler eggs (Acrocephalus arundinaceus). We also manipulated the colour of eggs when the original spot pattern remained the same. Spot density (approximately 15-75%) did not significantly affect rejection rate (8-20% rejection), but when spots fully covered the eggs, i.e. the eggshell was plain dark brown, rejection rate increased abruptly to 100%. A loglinear model revealed the significant influence of colour on rejection rates, although there was no interactive effect between spottedness and colour. Our results strongly support the differential use of egg markers in host's egg discrimination, suggesting that spot density has limited importance compared to eggshell colour.

AB - Many hosts of the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) exhibit egg recognition, and reject parasitic eggs. How do hosts discriminate cuckoo eggs from their own? Hosts might be able to recognize their own eggs using the specific pigment pattern on the outer eggshell surface, which may serve as a cue for recognition. We tested if patterns of egg pigments (spottedness) contain this information by manipulating spot density of great reed warbler eggs (Acrocephalus arundinaceus). We also manipulated the colour of eggs when the original spot pattern remained the same. Spot density (approximately 15-75%) did not significantly affect rejection rate (8-20% rejection), but when spots fully covered the eggs, i.e. the eggshell was plain dark brown, rejection rate increased abruptly to 100%. A loglinear model revealed the significant influence of colour on rejection rates, although there was no interactive effect between spottedness and colour. Our results strongly support the differential use of egg markers in host's egg discrimination, suggesting that spot density has limited importance compared to eggshell colour.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38149072257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2007.01456.x

U2 - 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2007.01456.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2007.01456.x

M3 - Article

VL - 114

SP - 186

EP - 194

JO - Ethology

JF - Ethology

SN - 0179-1613

IS - 2

ER -