High volumetric and energy densities of methane stored in nanoporous materials at ambient temperatures and moderate pressures

Nuno Bimbo, Andrew Physick, Antonio Noguera-Diaz, Adam Pugsley, Leighton Holyfield, Valeska Ting, Tim Mays

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)
88 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Experimental results for methane adsorption on two high-surface area carbons (TE7-20 and AX-21) and one metal-organic framework (MIL-101(Cr)) are presented, with isotherms obtained at temperatures ranging from 250 to 350 K and at pressures up to 15 MPa. The isotherms were analysed to determine if these materials could be viable alternatives for on-board solid-state storage of methane. The results show a very high adsorbate density in the pores of all materials, which for some can even exceed liquid methane density. At moderate pressures below 5 MPa, the calculated total energy densities are close to the energy density of methanol, and are almost 40 % of the energy density of gasoline (petrol). Compared with standard compression at the same conditions, the results show that adsorption can be a competitive storage alternative, as it can offer equal volumetric capacities at much lower pressures, hence reducing the energy penalty associated with compression. It is shown that the optimal conditions for adsorptive methane storage in these materials are at moderate pressure ranges, where the gains in amounts stored when using an adsorbent are more pronounced when compared to cylinders of compressed methane gas at the same operating conditions. Finally, a study on deliverable capacities for adsorbed methane was carried out, simulating two charging pressure scenarios of 3.5 and 6.5 MPa and discharge at 0.5 MPa. The results show that some of the tested materials have high working volumetric capacities, with some materials displaying more than 140 kg m-3 volumetric working capacity for charging at 6.5 MPa and delivery at 0.5 MPa.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)38-47
JournalChemical Engineering Journal
Volume272
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jul 2015

Fingerprint

Methane
methane
energy
temperature
Isotherms
Liquid methane
Temperature
isotherm
Adsorption
compression
adsorption
Adsorbates
Adsorbents
Gasoline
Methanol
Compaction
Carbon
Gases
Metals
methanol

Cite this

High volumetric and energy densities of methane stored in nanoporous materials at ambient temperatures and moderate pressures. / Bimbo, Nuno; Physick, Andrew; Noguera-Diaz, Antonio; Pugsley, Adam; Holyfield, Leighton; Ting, Valeska; Mays, Tim.

In: Chemical Engineering Journal, Vol. 272, 15.07.2015, p. 38-47.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bimbo, Nuno ; Physick, Andrew ; Noguera-Diaz, Antonio ; Pugsley, Adam ; Holyfield, Leighton ; Ting, Valeska ; Mays, Tim. / High volumetric and energy densities of methane stored in nanoporous materials at ambient temperatures and moderate pressures. In: Chemical Engineering Journal. 2015 ; Vol. 272. pp. 38-47.
@article{66d10a6bbb6c4371aa3bf86a8001c15c,
title = "High volumetric and energy densities of methane stored in nanoporous materials at ambient temperatures and moderate pressures",
abstract = "Experimental results for methane adsorption on two high-surface area carbons (TE7-20 and AX-21) and one metal-organic framework (MIL-101(Cr)) are presented, with isotherms obtained at temperatures ranging from 250 to 350 K and at pressures up to 15 MPa. The isotherms were analysed to determine if these materials could be viable alternatives for on-board solid-state storage of methane. The results show a very high adsorbate density in the pores of all materials, which for some can even exceed liquid methane density. At moderate pressures below 5 MPa, the calculated total energy densities are close to the energy density of methanol, and are almost 40 {\%} of the energy density of gasoline (petrol). Compared with standard compression at the same conditions, the results show that adsorption can be a competitive storage alternative, as it can offer equal volumetric capacities at much lower pressures, hence reducing the energy penalty associated with compression. It is shown that the optimal conditions for adsorptive methane storage in these materials are at moderate pressure ranges, where the gains in amounts stored when using an adsorbent are more pronounced when compared to cylinders of compressed methane gas at the same operating conditions. Finally, a study on deliverable capacities for adsorbed methane was carried out, simulating two charging pressure scenarios of 3.5 and 6.5 MPa and discharge at 0.5 MPa. The results show that some of the tested materials have high working volumetric capacities, with some materials displaying more than 140 kg m-3 volumetric working capacity for charging at 6.5 MPa and delivery at 0.5 MPa.",
author = "Nuno Bimbo and Andrew Physick and Antonio Noguera-Diaz and Adam Pugsley and Leighton Holyfield and Valeska Ting and Tim Mays",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.cej.2015.02.088",
language = "English",
volume = "272",
pages = "38--47",
journal = "Chemical Engineering Journal",
issn = "1385-8947",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - High volumetric and energy densities of methane stored in nanoporous materials at ambient temperatures and moderate pressures

AU - Bimbo, Nuno

AU - Physick, Andrew

AU - Noguera-Diaz, Antonio

AU - Pugsley, Adam

AU - Holyfield, Leighton

AU - Ting, Valeska

AU - Mays, Tim

PY - 2015/7/15

Y1 - 2015/7/15

N2 - Experimental results for methane adsorption on two high-surface area carbons (TE7-20 and AX-21) and one metal-organic framework (MIL-101(Cr)) are presented, with isotherms obtained at temperatures ranging from 250 to 350 K and at pressures up to 15 MPa. The isotherms were analysed to determine if these materials could be viable alternatives for on-board solid-state storage of methane. The results show a very high adsorbate density in the pores of all materials, which for some can even exceed liquid methane density. At moderate pressures below 5 MPa, the calculated total energy densities are close to the energy density of methanol, and are almost 40 % of the energy density of gasoline (petrol). Compared with standard compression at the same conditions, the results show that adsorption can be a competitive storage alternative, as it can offer equal volumetric capacities at much lower pressures, hence reducing the energy penalty associated with compression. It is shown that the optimal conditions for adsorptive methane storage in these materials are at moderate pressure ranges, where the gains in amounts stored when using an adsorbent are more pronounced when compared to cylinders of compressed methane gas at the same operating conditions. Finally, a study on deliverable capacities for adsorbed methane was carried out, simulating two charging pressure scenarios of 3.5 and 6.5 MPa and discharge at 0.5 MPa. The results show that some of the tested materials have high working volumetric capacities, with some materials displaying more than 140 kg m-3 volumetric working capacity for charging at 6.5 MPa and delivery at 0.5 MPa.

AB - Experimental results for methane adsorption on two high-surface area carbons (TE7-20 and AX-21) and one metal-organic framework (MIL-101(Cr)) are presented, with isotherms obtained at temperatures ranging from 250 to 350 K and at pressures up to 15 MPa. The isotherms were analysed to determine if these materials could be viable alternatives for on-board solid-state storage of methane. The results show a very high adsorbate density in the pores of all materials, which for some can even exceed liquid methane density. At moderate pressures below 5 MPa, the calculated total energy densities are close to the energy density of methanol, and are almost 40 % of the energy density of gasoline (petrol). Compared with standard compression at the same conditions, the results show that adsorption can be a competitive storage alternative, as it can offer equal volumetric capacities at much lower pressures, hence reducing the energy penalty associated with compression. It is shown that the optimal conditions for adsorptive methane storage in these materials are at moderate pressure ranges, where the gains in amounts stored when using an adsorbent are more pronounced when compared to cylinders of compressed methane gas at the same operating conditions. Finally, a study on deliverable capacities for adsorbed methane was carried out, simulating two charging pressure scenarios of 3.5 and 6.5 MPa and discharge at 0.5 MPa. The results show that some of the tested materials have high working volumetric capacities, with some materials displaying more than 140 kg m-3 volumetric working capacity for charging at 6.5 MPa and delivery at 0.5 MPa.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.02.088

U2 - 10.1016/j.cej.2015.02.088

DO - 10.1016/j.cej.2015.02.088

M3 - Article

VL - 272

SP - 38

EP - 47

JO - Chemical Engineering Journal

JF - Chemical Engineering Journal

SN - 1385-8947

ER -