Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Healthier Place-Making: Implementation of a New Supplementary Planning Document to Improve Amenity Space and Place Quality in a Local Council in London, UK

  • Hannah J. Littlecott
  • , Chloe Forte
  • , Georgina K. Wort
  • , Shobhana Nagraj
  • , Rona Campbell
  • , Natasha A. Reid
  • , John Stiles
  • , Judi Kidger
  • University of Bristol
  • University College Dublin
  • Department of Population Health Sciences
  • University of Cambridge
  • East London NHS Foundation Trust
  • Matter Space Soul
  • Brent Council

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The impact of the built environment on physical and mental health and wellbeing has been evidenced worldwide. Quality and design affect residents’ wellbeing and physical and mental health outcomes. A local authority planning team in London introduced new guidance to improve the quality of amenity space within residential developments. This paper aims to evaluate the early implementation of this guidance using Normalisation Process Theory. A qualitative design was employed using semi-structured interviews (n = 34), with a purposive sample of planning staff, applicants, review panel members and organisers and elected officials. Framework analysis was undertaken. All stakeholders perceived the introduction of the new amenity space guidance positively, but views of the planning officer training that accompanied it were more nuanced. Key factors influencing implementation included attitude towards and understanding of the new guidance, use of common language, workload, number of policy and guidance documents and a lack of a guidance template from the beginning. Further contextual barriers included the need for economic viability for developers and affordable housing in the area. To further embed and sustain implementation, it is recommended that the guidance continues to be used in a flexible manner with ongoing training and focused support for both planning officers and planning applicants.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2521
Number of pages17
JournalBuildings
Volume16
Issue number13
Early online date25 Jun 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2026

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request. The data are not publicly available due to the fact that J.S. and N.A.R. developed the intervention and worked for the council. They were completely independent from data analysis.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Public Health Intervention Responsive Studies Team (grant number: PHIRST/NIHR131567). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. Funders had no involvement in data analysis, data interpretation or writing of the paper. For more information about this study, please visit https://phirst.nihr.ac.uk.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • amenity space
  • framework analysis
  • health
  • local authority-led intervention
  • Normalisation Process Theory
  • qualitative interviews
  • residential developments
  • wellbeing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Architecture
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Healthier Place-Making: Implementation of a New Supplementary Planning Document to Improve Amenity Space and Place Quality in a Local Council in London, UK'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this