Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Health promotion in tertiary music institutions: a position paper

  • Raluca Matei
  • , B. Ackermann
  • , J. Allen
  • , U. Alpagut
  • , K. Ananda-Owens
  • , L. S. Araújo
  • , R. Arnold
  • , K. Árnason
  • , T. Babyak
  • , M. Baroody
  • , F. Barreto Kochem
  • , S. Bastepe-Gray
  • , K. Behel
  • , K. R. Beuschau
  • , M. Bidlack
  • , C. Blouin
  • , A. Bull
  • , A. Bush
  • , S. Callan-Harris
  • , K. Chesky
  • J-Y. Chi, R. Chiu, V. Cornett, M. Cortesi, S. Couth, A. Détári, U. Devadas, M. Doğantan-Dack, S. Dunbar, G. Ege, A. Evans, M. Frost, M. Fujimoto, P. Garden, D. Gilchrist, D. Gilbert, J. Ginsborg, L. Gooding, J. Hunt, A. Lee, S-A. Li, H. Lim, K. Phillips, M. Robinson, D. Rose, L. Smith, M. S. Taylor, J. M. Yang, B. Young
  • Birkbeck, University of London
  • The University of Sydney School of Health Sciences
  • Music Therapy, Berklee College of Music
  • Bolu Abant İzzet, Baysal University
  • St. Olaf College
  • Schulich School of Music, McGill University
  • Department of Physical Therapy, University of Iceland
  • Independent Scholar
  • Peabody Institute of the Johns Hopkins University
  • Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of the Philippines College of Medicine
  • Independent Researcher
  • Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Esbjerg and Grindsted Hospital, University of Southern Denmark
  • Johns Hopkins Voice Center at GBMC, Johns Hopkins University
  • Department of Innovation in Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval
  • Syracuse University
  • Eastman School of Music, University of Rochester
  • Research Center for Music, Technology, and Health, National Tsing Hua University (NTHU)
  • Keyboard Studies, University of St. Thomas
  • Centre for Music Education and Human Flourishing, School of Arts and Creative Technologies, University of York
  • Division of Psychology, Communication and Human Neuroscience, the University of Manchester
  • Imperial College London
  • Department of Speech and Hearing, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education
  • Faculty of Music, University of Cambridge
  • Department of Music, Jacksonville State University
  • Haukeland University Hospital
  • University of Sydney
  • Independent Consultant
  • Graduate School of Education, The University of Tokyo
  • Royal Liverpool Philharmonic
  • Academic and Educational Programming, Bader College
  • Music, College of Liberal Arts, University of Minnesota
  • ViAMUS, North-West University
  • College of Music, Florida State University
  • Institute of Music Physiology and Musicians’ Medicine, Hanover University of Music, Drama and Media, Hanover
  • Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto
  • Dermatology, HCA Medical City Forth Worth, University of North Texas Health Science Center
  • Royal Northern College of Music
  • School of Sport, Exercise and Health Science, Loughborough University
  • School of Music, Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts
  • Sports Psychology, University of Portsmouth
  • Office of Engagement and Extension, Colorado State University
  • Rehabilitation Medicine Physician, University of the Philippines Manila

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Abstract

Health promotion in tertiary music education lacks shared guidance despite rising concern for musicians’ well-being. This position paper addresses that gap with a consensus-based, evidence-informed framework developed by 122 contributors across six continents and a variety of disciplines, including musicians and student representatives. It advances a broad understanding of health—physical, psychological, social, cultural, and occupational—and positions health promotion as integral to musicking rather than an add-on. We offer seven adaptable recommendations for institutions: (1) Reframe musicianship through health-informed cultural transformation; (2) Transform institutional culture and governance; (3) Collaborate across disciplines and expertise; (4) Equip educators, leaders, and staff to promote health; (5) Empower students as agents of change; (6) Build a health-informed music curriculum; and (7) Establish health education as core requirement. To support implementation, the paper outlines concise curriculum content areas (e.g., mental, physical, hearing, and vocal health; disability and neurodivergence; critical thinking and artistic identity; professional advocacy) and learning outcomes mapped to Bloom’s taxonomy, progressing from awareness to application, evaluation, and creation. Designed for contextual adaptation, the framework enables institutions to improve student and staff well-being, enhance educational quality, and model a more inclusive, sustainable music ecosystem.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-26
JournalArts Education Policy Review
Early online date30 Aug 2026
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 30 Aug 2026

Acknowledgements

We thank Natalie Roe, Chair of Conservatoires UK StudentNetwork, for her invaluable input into this Position Paper.

Keywords

  • arts education
  • arts policy
  • cultural policy
  • Institutional culture
  • professional advocacy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Health promotion in tertiary music institutions: a position paper'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this