Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Harmful words: A qualitative survey of pain clinicians’ perspectives on unhelpful messages in chronic pain

Abbie Jordan, Phoebe Brook-Rowland, Melanie Noel, J Gauntlett-Gilbert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1   Link opens in a new tab Citation (SciVal)

Abstract

Individuals living with chronic pain report experiences of stigma and invalidation, including from health professionals. Anecdotally, specialist pain clinicians must work hard to engage and treat patients who have past experiences of professionals discounting their pain, or of confusing or unsettling messaging about the cause of their symptoms. However, no study has yet explored pain clinicians’ perspectives on unhelpful clinical messaging in this area. We conducted an online qualitative survey of 165 international pain clinicians, asking about the unhelpful messages heard, and repeated, by their patients. Participants reported unhelpful messaging as prevalent and clinically impactful. Qualitative survey data was analysed using inductive reflexive thematic analysis. Five themes were generated: (1) all in your head, (2) you're physically vulnerable, (3) an elusive fix, (4) the end of the line, (5) inadequate pain explanations. The results underscore the importance of taking a validating stance towards patients’ pain report and avoiding messages that discourage movement and exercise. Pain clinicians were reluctant to endorse multiple investigations to find an imagined ‘cause’ for pain but also disliked clinical messages that implied hopelessness about the chronic pain situation. These results can guide clinical conversations in many settings where people with chronic pain receive care. Perspective: Messages provided by clinicians to individuals living with chronic pain can be deleterious and unhelpful. Such clinical messages may invalidate pain, discourage movement, increase diagnostic uncertainty and/or provide a fatalistic long term outlook. Improvements in pain education for clinicians are required.

Original languageEnglish
Article number105524
JournalJournal of Pain
Volume35
Early online date7 Aug 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Oct 2025

Acknowledgements

We thank all the clinicians who kindly shared their thoughts with us in the online survey. We also thank Tess Rugg who kindly supported compiling the demographic information for the study participants. The authors would like to thank the Donated Funds Committee of the Royal United Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust for this study.

Funding

We thank all the clinicians who kindly shared their thoughts with us in the online survey. We also thank Tess Rugg who kindly supported compiling the demographic information for the study participants. The authors would like to thank the Donated Funds Committee of the Royal United Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust for this study.

FundersFunder number
Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust

    Keywords

    • Communication
    • Diagnostic uncertainty
    • Pain education
    • Qualitative
    • Validation

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Neurology
    • Clinical Neurology
    • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Harmful words: A qualitative survey of pain clinicians’ perspectives on unhelpful messages in chronic pain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this