Haemosporidian infections are more common in breeding shorebirds than in migrating shorebirds

William Jones, Zsófia Tóth, Viacheslav Khursanov, Nastassia Kisliakova, Oliver Krüger, Tamás Székely, Natalia Karlionova, Pavel Pinchuk, Nayden Chakarov

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Migrating animals are thought to be important spillover sources for novel pathogens. Haemosporidians (malaria-related parasites) are one such group of pathogens that commonly spillover into novel host communities if competent vectors are present. In birds, shorebirds (sandpipers, plovers and allies) perform some of the longest avian migrations, yet they are traditionally perceived as relatively free from haemosporidians. Although low prevalence fits several theories, such as effective immune responses or low exposure to vectors, few studies have been carried out in freshwater inland sites, where the vectors of haemosporidians (e.g. mosquitoes) are abundant, with a mixture of actively migrating (staging) and breeding hosts. Here we report the prevalence of three haemosporidian parasites, Haemoproteus, Leucocytozoon and Plasmodium, screened in 214 shorebirds from 15 species sampled in a freshwater marshland, southern Belarus. Contrary to most previous studies, we found that haemosporidians were frequent, with an overall prevalence in the community of 16.36%, including the locally breeding shorebirds (23.13%, 134 individuals of 10 species). However, actively migrating shorebirds had much lower prevalence (0.05%, 55 individuals of five species). We suggest that blood parasite infections are more common in shorebirds than currently acknowledged. Yet, actively migrating species may be free from haemosporidians or carry suppressed infections, leading to lower prevalence or even apparent absence in some species. Taken together, we theorize that a combination of sampling biases has driven our understanding of haemosporidian prevalence in shorebirds and future studies should take the migratory status of individuals into account when reporting prevalence. Furthermore, we argue that birds undergoing active migration may be less likely sources of spillover events than previously assumed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1354-1367
Number of pages14
JournalIbis
Volume166
Issue number4
Early online date4 Mar 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Oct 2024

Data Availability Statement

All sex, species and infection data used in this paper are available in the Supporting Information. In addition, lineage data have been uploaded to the MalAvi Database (http://130.235.244.92/Malavi/)

Funding

Research was supported by the German Research foundation (SFB TRR 212; 396780709; 398434413 to N.C.); the Hungarian National Funding Agency (ÉLVONAL KKP‐126949 to T.S.); the National Talent Programme Hungary (NTP‐NFTÖ‐21‐B‐0346 to Z.F.); and the Royal Society Wolfson Merit Award (WM170050, APEX APX\R1\191 045 to T.S.). The funding agencies had no input into the content of the manuscript nor did they request pre‐submission or pre‐publication approval.

FundersFunder number
Hungarian National Funding AgencyÉLVONAL KKP‐126949
National Talent Programme HungaryNTP‐NFTÖ‐21‐B‐0346
Royal SocietyWM170050, APEX APX\R1\191 045
Royal Society
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft398434413, SFB TRR 212, 396780709
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

    Keywords

    • Avian malaria
    • community ecology
    • infection
    • migration
    • shorebird

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
    • Animal Science and Zoology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Haemosporidian infections are more common in breeding shorebirds than in migrating shorebirds'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this