Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (RSA) of implants

E. R. Valstar, R. Gill, L. Ryd, G. Flivik, N. Borlin, J. Karrholm

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

306 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is a need for standardization of radiostereometric (RSA) investigations to facilitate comparison of outcome reported from different research groups. In this document, 6 research centers have agreed upon standards for terminology, description and use of RSA arrangement including radiographic set-up and techniques. Consensus regarding minimum requirements for marker stability and scatter, choice of coordinate systems, and preferred way of describing prosthetic micromotion is of special interest. Some notes on data interpretation are also presented. Validation of RSA should be standardized by preparation of protocols for assessment of accuracy and precision. Practical issues related to loading of the joint by weight bearing or other conditions, follow-up intervals, length of follow-up, radiation dose, and the exclusion of patients due to technical errors are considered. Finally, we present a checklist of standardized output that should be included in any clinical RSA paper.This document will form the basis of a detailed standardization protocol under supervision of ISO and the European Standards Working Group on Joint Replacement Implants (CEN/TC 285/WG4). This protocol will facilitate inclusion of RSA in a standard protocol for implant testing before it is released for general use. Such a protocol-also including other recognized clinical outcome parameters-will reduce the risk of implanting potentially inferior prostheses on a large scale.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)563-572
Number of pages10
JournalActa Orthopaedica
Volume76
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Radiostereometric Analysis
Guidelines
Replacement Arthroplasties
Weight-Bearing
Checklist
Research
Terminology
Prostheses and Implants
Joints
Radiation

Cite this

Valstar, E. R., Gill, R., Ryd, L., Flivik, G., Borlin, N., & Karrholm, J. (2005). Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (RSA) of implants. Acta Orthopaedica, 76(4), 563-572. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670510041574

Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (RSA) of implants. / Valstar, E. R.; Gill, R.; Ryd, L.; Flivik, G.; Borlin, N.; Karrholm, J.

In: Acta Orthopaedica, Vol. 76, No. 4, 2005, p. 563-572.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Valstar, ER, Gill, R, Ryd, L, Flivik, G, Borlin, N & Karrholm, J 2005, 'Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (RSA) of implants', Acta Orthopaedica, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 563-572. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670510041574
Valstar, E. R. ; Gill, R. ; Ryd, L. ; Flivik, G. ; Borlin, N. ; Karrholm, J. / Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (RSA) of implants. In: Acta Orthopaedica. 2005 ; Vol. 76, No. 4. pp. 563-572.
@article{f28a3f1a23754176a2b04cc2fa8836d2,
title = "Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (RSA) of implants",
abstract = "There is a need for standardization of radiostereometric (RSA) investigations to facilitate comparison of outcome reported from different research groups. In this document, 6 research centers have agreed upon standards for terminology, description and use of RSA arrangement including radiographic set-up and techniques. Consensus regarding minimum requirements for marker stability and scatter, choice of coordinate systems, and preferred way of describing prosthetic micromotion is of special interest. Some notes on data interpretation are also presented. Validation of RSA should be standardized by preparation of protocols for assessment of accuracy and precision. Practical issues related to loading of the joint by weight bearing or other conditions, follow-up intervals, length of follow-up, radiation dose, and the exclusion of patients due to technical errors are considered. Finally, we present a checklist of standardized output that should be included in any clinical RSA paper.This document will form the basis of a detailed standardization protocol under supervision of ISO and the European Standards Working Group on Joint Replacement Implants (CEN/TC 285/WG4). This protocol will facilitate inclusion of RSA in a standard protocol for implant testing before it is released for general use. Such a protocol-also including other recognized clinical outcome parameters-will reduce the risk of implanting potentially inferior prostheses on a large scale.",
author = "Valstar, {E. R.} and R. Gill and L. Ryd and G. Flivik and N. Borlin and J. Karrholm",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1080/17453670510041574",
language = "English",
volume = "76",
pages = "563--572",
journal = "Acta Orthopaedica",
issn = "1745-3674",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (RSA) of implants

AU - Valstar, E. R.

AU - Gill, R.

AU - Ryd, L.

AU - Flivik, G.

AU - Borlin, N.

AU - Karrholm, J.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - There is a need for standardization of radiostereometric (RSA) investigations to facilitate comparison of outcome reported from different research groups. In this document, 6 research centers have agreed upon standards for terminology, description and use of RSA arrangement including radiographic set-up and techniques. Consensus regarding minimum requirements for marker stability and scatter, choice of coordinate systems, and preferred way of describing prosthetic micromotion is of special interest. Some notes on data interpretation are also presented. Validation of RSA should be standardized by preparation of protocols for assessment of accuracy and precision. Practical issues related to loading of the joint by weight bearing or other conditions, follow-up intervals, length of follow-up, radiation dose, and the exclusion of patients due to technical errors are considered. Finally, we present a checklist of standardized output that should be included in any clinical RSA paper.This document will form the basis of a detailed standardization protocol under supervision of ISO and the European Standards Working Group on Joint Replacement Implants (CEN/TC 285/WG4). This protocol will facilitate inclusion of RSA in a standard protocol for implant testing before it is released for general use. Such a protocol-also including other recognized clinical outcome parameters-will reduce the risk of implanting potentially inferior prostheses on a large scale.

AB - There is a need for standardization of radiostereometric (RSA) investigations to facilitate comparison of outcome reported from different research groups. In this document, 6 research centers have agreed upon standards for terminology, description and use of RSA arrangement including radiographic set-up and techniques. Consensus regarding minimum requirements for marker stability and scatter, choice of coordinate systems, and preferred way of describing prosthetic micromotion is of special interest. Some notes on data interpretation are also presented. Validation of RSA should be standardized by preparation of protocols for assessment of accuracy and precision. Practical issues related to loading of the joint by weight bearing or other conditions, follow-up intervals, length of follow-up, radiation dose, and the exclusion of patients due to technical errors are considered. Finally, we present a checklist of standardized output that should be included in any clinical RSA paper.This document will form the basis of a detailed standardization protocol under supervision of ISO and the European Standards Working Group on Joint Replacement Implants (CEN/TC 285/WG4). This protocol will facilitate inclusion of RSA in a standard protocol for implant testing before it is released for general use. Such a protocol-also including other recognized clinical outcome parameters-will reduce the risk of implanting potentially inferior prostheses on a large scale.

UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=16195075

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453670510041574

U2 - 10.1080/17453670510041574

DO - 10.1080/17453670510041574

M3 - Article

VL - 76

SP - 563

EP - 572

JO - Acta Orthopaedica

JF - Acta Orthopaedica

SN - 1745-3674

IS - 4

ER -