Group Inequality and Conflict

Idranil Dutta, Paul Madden, Ajit Mishra

Research output: Working paper

101 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper presents a theoretical model to show how distributional concerns can engender social confl‡ict. We have a two period model, where the cost of confl‡ict is endogenous in the sense that parties involved have full control over the level of confl‡ict they can create. Our analysis highlights the crucial role of future inequality. It is shown, equality of assets or income in the current period does not stop confl‡ict from taking place if the anticipated future inequality is signi…cant. Further we find that the impact of inequality on confl‡ict is not straightforward. Since confl‡ict is costly for both groups, societies with low levels of inequality show no confl‡ict; groups engage in confl‡ict only when inequality exceeds a certain threshold level. Additionally the model shows that the link between inequality and confl‡ict may be non-monotonic.

Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationBath, U.K.
PublisherDepartment of Economics, University of Bath
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Publication series

NameBath Economics Research Working Papers
No.10/12

Fingerprint

Assets
Equality
Income
Costs

Keywords

  • conflict
  • group inequality
  • Nash bargaining

Cite this

Dutta, I., Madden, P., & Mishra, A. (2012). Group Inequality and Conflict. (Bath Economics Research Working Papers; No. 10/12). Bath, U.K.: Department of Economics, University of Bath.

Group Inequality and Conflict. / Dutta, Idranil; Madden, Paul; Mishra, Ajit.

Bath, U.K. : Department of Economics, University of Bath, 2012. (Bath Economics Research Working Papers; No. 10/12).

Research output: Working paper

Dutta, I, Madden, P & Mishra, A 2012 'Group Inequality and Conflict' Bath Economics Research Working Papers, no. 10/12, Department of Economics, University of Bath, Bath, U.K.
Dutta I, Madden P, Mishra A. Group Inequality and Conflict. Bath, U.K.: Department of Economics, University of Bath. 2012. (Bath Economics Research Working Papers; 10/12).
Dutta, Idranil ; Madden, Paul ; Mishra, Ajit. / Group Inequality and Conflict. Bath, U.K. : Department of Economics, University of Bath, 2012. (Bath Economics Research Working Papers; 10/12).
@techreport{139eb311ff5e4312aa3a3b75710a68dc,
title = "Group Inequality and Conflict",
abstract = "This paper presents a theoretical model to show how distributional concerns can engender social confl‡ict. We have a two period model, where the cost of confl‡ict is endogenous in the sense that parties involved have full control over the level of confl‡ict they can create. Our analysis highlights the crucial role of future inequality. It is shown, equality of assets or income in the current period does not stop confl‡ict from taking place if the anticipated future inequality is signi…cant. Further we find that the impact of inequality on confl‡ict is not straightforward. Since confl‡ict is costly for both groups, societies with low levels of inequality show no confl‡ict; groups engage in confl‡ict only when inequality exceeds a certain threshold level. Additionally the model shows that the link between inequality and confl‡ict may be non-monotonic.",
keywords = "conflict, group inequality, Nash bargaining",
author = "Idranil Dutta and Paul Madden and Ajit Mishra",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
series = "Bath Economics Research Working Papers",
publisher = "Department of Economics, University of Bath",
number = "10/12",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Department of Economics, University of Bath",

}

TY - UNPB

T1 - Group Inequality and Conflict

AU - Dutta, Idranil

AU - Madden, Paul

AU - Mishra, Ajit

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - This paper presents a theoretical model to show how distributional concerns can engender social confl‡ict. We have a two period model, where the cost of confl‡ict is endogenous in the sense that parties involved have full control over the level of confl‡ict they can create. Our analysis highlights the crucial role of future inequality. It is shown, equality of assets or income in the current period does not stop confl‡ict from taking place if the anticipated future inequality is signi…cant. Further we find that the impact of inequality on confl‡ict is not straightforward. Since confl‡ict is costly for both groups, societies with low levels of inequality show no confl‡ict; groups engage in confl‡ict only when inequality exceeds a certain threshold level. Additionally the model shows that the link between inequality and confl‡ict may be non-monotonic.

AB - This paper presents a theoretical model to show how distributional concerns can engender social confl‡ict. We have a two period model, where the cost of confl‡ict is endogenous in the sense that parties involved have full control over the level of confl‡ict they can create. Our analysis highlights the crucial role of future inequality. It is shown, equality of assets or income in the current period does not stop confl‡ict from taking place if the anticipated future inequality is signi…cant. Further we find that the impact of inequality on confl‡ict is not straightforward. Since confl‡ict is costly for both groups, societies with low levels of inequality show no confl‡ict; groups engage in confl‡ict only when inequality exceeds a certain threshold level. Additionally the model shows that the link between inequality and confl‡ict may be non-monotonic.

KW - conflict

KW - group inequality

KW - Nash bargaining

M3 - Working paper

T3 - Bath Economics Research Working Papers

BT - Group Inequality and Conflict

PB - Department of Economics, University of Bath

CY - Bath, U.K.

ER -