Grounded Theory analysis of commuters discussing a workplace carbon-reduction target

Autonomy, satisfaction, and willingness to change behaviour in drivers, pedestrians, bicyclists, motorcyclists, and bus users

G.O. Thomas, I. Walker, C. Musselwhite

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)
74 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This qualitative analysis compared focus group discussions of a carbon reduction target amongst users of different modes who travel to the same workplace. Grounded Theory analysis showed discussions expanded to wider carbon costs and more issues than those specifically described in the target. Differences in people's perceptions of carbon emissions varied with travel mode: walkers and bicyclists showed high awareness and concern; car drivers and motorcyclists were more pessimistic and cautious of imposing restrictions, with a particular suspicion of 'greenwash' actions that do not provide actual benefits. Changing travel mode for carbon reduction was discussed cautiously by all groups, with concern over the legitimacy of efforts to influence a personal choice, and the need for a 'balanced' approach that would not punish personal decisions. Notably, participants discussed their current mode in terms of perceived autonomy, and feared losing this autonomy if they changed mode. This role of autonomy emerged as a central theme in discussions of carbon reduction, providing ideas for future interventions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)72-81
Number of pages10
JournalTransportation Research Part F - Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Volume26
Issue numberPART A
Early online date30 Jul 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2014

Fingerprint

commuter
Motor Vehicles
pedestrian
grounded theory
Workplace
Carbon
workplace
autonomy
driver
travel
group discussion
Walkers
legitimacy
Illegitimacy
Focus Groups
costs
Railroad cars
Grounded Theory
Pedestrians
Costs and Cost Analysis

Cite this

@article{64acf9345b584bfdaf860ed30299450e,
title = "Grounded Theory analysis of commuters discussing a workplace carbon-reduction target: Autonomy, satisfaction, and willingness to change behaviour in drivers, pedestrians, bicyclists, motorcyclists, and bus users",
abstract = "This qualitative analysis compared focus group discussions of a carbon reduction target amongst users of different modes who travel to the same workplace. Grounded Theory analysis showed discussions expanded to wider carbon costs and more issues than those specifically described in the target. Differences in people's perceptions of carbon emissions varied with travel mode: walkers and bicyclists showed high awareness and concern; car drivers and motorcyclists were more pessimistic and cautious of imposing restrictions, with a particular suspicion of 'greenwash' actions that do not provide actual benefits. Changing travel mode for carbon reduction was discussed cautiously by all groups, with concern over the legitimacy of efforts to influence a personal choice, and the need for a 'balanced' approach that would not punish personal decisions. Notably, participants discussed their current mode in terms of perceived autonomy, and feared losing this autonomy if they changed mode. This role of autonomy emerged as a central theme in discussions of carbon reduction, providing ideas for future interventions.",
author = "G.O. Thomas and I. Walker and C. Musselwhite",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.trf.2014.06.009",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "72--81",
journal = "Transportation Research Part F - Traffic Psychology and Behaviour",
issn = "1369-8478",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "PART A",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Grounded Theory analysis of commuters discussing a workplace carbon-reduction target

T2 - Autonomy, satisfaction, and willingness to change behaviour in drivers, pedestrians, bicyclists, motorcyclists, and bus users

AU - Thomas, G.O.

AU - Walker, I.

AU - Musselwhite, C.

PY - 2014/9

Y1 - 2014/9

N2 - This qualitative analysis compared focus group discussions of a carbon reduction target amongst users of different modes who travel to the same workplace. Grounded Theory analysis showed discussions expanded to wider carbon costs and more issues than those specifically described in the target. Differences in people's perceptions of carbon emissions varied with travel mode: walkers and bicyclists showed high awareness and concern; car drivers and motorcyclists were more pessimistic and cautious of imposing restrictions, with a particular suspicion of 'greenwash' actions that do not provide actual benefits. Changing travel mode for carbon reduction was discussed cautiously by all groups, with concern over the legitimacy of efforts to influence a personal choice, and the need for a 'balanced' approach that would not punish personal decisions. Notably, participants discussed their current mode in terms of perceived autonomy, and feared losing this autonomy if they changed mode. This role of autonomy emerged as a central theme in discussions of carbon reduction, providing ideas for future interventions.

AB - This qualitative analysis compared focus group discussions of a carbon reduction target amongst users of different modes who travel to the same workplace. Grounded Theory analysis showed discussions expanded to wider carbon costs and more issues than those specifically described in the target. Differences in people's perceptions of carbon emissions varied with travel mode: walkers and bicyclists showed high awareness and concern; car drivers and motorcyclists were more pessimistic and cautious of imposing restrictions, with a particular suspicion of 'greenwash' actions that do not provide actual benefits. Changing travel mode for carbon reduction was discussed cautiously by all groups, with concern over the legitimacy of efforts to influence a personal choice, and the need for a 'balanced' approach that would not punish personal decisions. Notably, participants discussed their current mode in terms of perceived autonomy, and feared losing this autonomy if they changed mode. This role of autonomy emerged as a central theme in discussions of carbon reduction, providing ideas for future interventions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905441679&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.06.009

U2 - 10.1016/j.trf.2014.06.009

DO - 10.1016/j.trf.2014.06.009

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 72

EP - 81

JO - Transportation Research Part F - Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

JF - Transportation Research Part F - Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

SN - 1369-8478

IS - PART A

ER -